I want to mention my simple mk-based package building system [1]. It is
not totally complete but builds packages fine both for my local system
and for ARM-based embedded system.
1. https://github.com/gravicappa/spmk
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 12:53:11PM +0100, FRIGN wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Dec 2013 12:06:03 +
> sin wrote:
> >
> > Are you planning on porting 9base only for the moment or are you thinking
> > of doing general sta.li work? A build system for sta.li would be awesome
> > to have.
> >
>
> Looking a
On Fri, 20 Dec 2013 12:06:03 +
sin wrote:
>
> Are you planning on porting 9base only for the moment or are you thinking
> of doing general sta.li work? A build system for sta.li would be awesome
> to have.
>
I am following the development of stali very actively, however having
trouble find
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 11:05:00AM +0100, FRIGN wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Dec 2013 11:51:20 +
> sin wrote:
> >
> > Personally, I'd go with musl. What is your plan at the moment?
> >
>
> I planned on going for musl, too. It seems to be the best option,
> especially because we're planning to link
On Fri, 20 Dec 2013 12:52:52 +0100
Anselm R Garbe wrote:
>
> musl is the way to go.
>
On Fri, 20 Dec 2013 11:51:20 +
sin wrote:
>
> Personally, I'd go with musl. What is your plan at the moment?
>
Thanks for the quick response!
I planned on going for musl, too. It seems to be the best
On 20 December 2013 10:40, FRIGN wrote:
> Greetings fellow hackers,
>
> I checked out the project ideas page[1] today and wondered if bionic
> was still a desirable choice for porting 9base or if other libraries
> like musl or dietlibc might be a better choice here, given the fact
> bionic is main
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 10:40:27AM +0100, FRIGN wrote:
> Greetings fellow hackers,
>
> I checked out the project ideas page[1] today and wondered if bionic
> was still a desirable choice for porting 9base or if other libraries
> like musl or dietlibc might be a better choice here, given the fact
>
Greetings fellow hackers,
I checked out the project ideas page[1] today and wondered if bionic
was still a desirable choice for porting 9base or if other libraries
like musl or dietlibc might be a better choice here, given the fact
bionic is mainly targeted at ARM (for instance, FORTIFY_SOURCE onl
