On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 10:40:27AM +0100, FRIGN wrote: > Greetings fellow hackers, > > I checked out the project ideas page[1] today and wondered if bionic > was still a desirable choice for porting 9base or if other libraries > like musl or dietlibc might be a better choice here, given the fact > bionic is mainly targeted at ARM (for instance, FORTIFY_SOURCE only > works on this arch and with GCC only). > > Could it be that bionic has been chosen as the lowest common > denominator to still be able to use it as one standard library also in > regard to C++ on sta.li?
Personally, I'd go with musl. What is your plan at the moment?
