On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 10:40:27AM +0100, FRIGN wrote:
> Greetings fellow hackers,
> 
> I checked out the project ideas page[1] today and wondered if bionic
> was still a desirable choice for porting 9base or if other libraries
> like musl or dietlibc might be a better choice here, given the fact
> bionic is mainly targeted at ARM (for instance, FORTIFY_SOURCE only
> works on this arch and with GCC only).
> 
> Could it be that bionic has been chosen as the lowest common
> denominator to still be able to use it as one standard library also in
> regard to C++ on sta.li?

Personally, I'd go with musl.  What is your plan at the moment?

Reply via email to