On 20 December 2013 10:40, FRIGN <d...@frign.de> wrote: > Greetings fellow hackers, > > I checked out the project ideas page[1] today and wondered if bionic > was still a desirable choice for porting 9base or if other libraries > like musl or dietlibc might be a better choice here, given the fact > bionic is mainly targeted at ARM (for instance, FORTIFY_SOURCE only > works on this arch and with GCC only). > > Could it be that bionic has been chosen as the lowest common > denominator to still be able to use it as one standard library also in > regard to C++ on sta.li? > > Please let me know so I can start with the work!
musl is the way to go. Cheers, Anselm
