On 04/17/2012 01:15 AM, Connor Lane Smith wrote:
> I'm confused about why we need to use a regular expression here. We
> can do this with a few loops and some ifs. Using regexes in seq(1)
> really, really concerns me.
A note on this from Rob Pike's blog:
http://commandcenter.blogspot.com/2011/08/r
1. Change default port from "ircd" to "6667" to not rely on
/etc/services.
2. Add util.c prerequisite for sic.o in Makefile.
diff -r 904b7747c223 -r 3cdf71a37e17 sic.c
--- a/sic.c Fri Aug 06 09:52:12 2010 +0100
+++ b/sic.c Sat Mar 05 21:49:13 2011 +0200
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
#include
static
C++ish declarations should be removed. Patch attached.
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 11:41:58AM +, Connor Lane Smith wrote:
> Hey,
>
> On 11 November 2010 05:25, Dan Brown wrote:
> > Why is this patch of interest? I call it "filtermode" because it uses
> > dmenu to generate a list of matches, with
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 10:14:02PM -0400, Sean Howard wrote:
> It depends on the game. Most games want an Object Oriented Language,
> simply because the OO design is the best for something dealing with
> the manipulation of objects. The problem is the lack of a good OO
> language. I don't really kn
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 05:27:39AM -0400, Kris Maglione wrote:
> English really isn't much more than bastardized Germanic with quite a
> lot of words stolen from Norman French, anyway. A bit like C++ to C,
> really.
German is overcomplicated too, try Swedish.
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 02:21:12PM +0100, Ethan Grammatikidis wrote:
> On w3.org by contrast the page on the cgi standard has nothing but
> dead links and references to an obsolete web server. I was searching
> for the CGI standard the other day, and couldn't find it _anywhere_.
It's here, btw: ht
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 09:59:02PM +0200, Antoni Grzymala wrote:
> May I suggest, that it would much simpler for the world to actually fix
> a few libs in a few conservative OS'es?
>
> There's nothing that makes the notion of one-byte-per-character somewhat
> universal. Just an arbitrary desision
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 07:29:34PM +0100, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> For my German conversations I'm in favor to rewrite German umlauts
> like so: ae/Ae oe/Oe ue/Ue and sz and be still UTF8 compliant,
> regardless the platform in use.
>
> I understand that for cyrillic this would be a problem though.
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 01:31:03PM +, Connor Lane Smith wrote:
> On 19/05/2010, Dmitry Maluka wrote:
> > That's OK inside a single project. But you wrote:
> >
> > "When it comes to code style questions, it is very likely that
> > individual programmers wi
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 01:46:18PM +0100, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> On 19 May 2010 13:38, Dmitry Maluka wrote:
> > On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 02:10:41PM +0200, Marvin Vek wrote:
> >> Don't see it as a limitation, getting a uniform look isn't that much
> >>
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 12:45:42PM +, Connor Lane Smith wrote:
> You might say that different styles are equal in their readability
> (though I personally think K&R trumps), but do we really have to learn
> a hundred different dialects? If we use similar styles it makes it a
> lot easier to con
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 02:10:41PM +0200, Marvin Vek wrote:
> Don't see it as a limitation, getting a uniform look isn't that much
> work and doesn't create confusion for programmers.
But it creates a feeling of the Third Reich. We're not industrial
monkeys, are we? Formal things like indentation
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 01:24:46PM +0200, pancake wrote:
> 2)
> syntax is not following the suckless style, I would prefer to have all source
> files in suckless following the same rules.
To me it's a silly limitation. The style is clean and uniform across the
program, that's all what's needed.
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 10:53:05PM +0200, mobi phil wrote:
> > Yeah, it's easy. Keeping simple is hard.
> Well, how many time do you preach this sentence one day? Why do you
> think that other people would be so idiot, that would not know such an
> obvious think?
Sorry but you look like an idiot.
Yes another sucking bloated program.
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 07:21:18PM +0200, mobi phil wrote:
> When you are looking some functions or some patters you use grep,
> isn't it? Each time you do grep, the file is loaded into memory, you
> do the next grep again, etc.
No. It's piped into grep. Pipe
Try btpd, a daemon + CLI.
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 08:16:37PM +0200, finkler wrote:
> While I agree with usability over standard fetishism, it isn't really
> the case that many Linux desktops are POSIX compliant.
A little off-topic, but I wish to remind that, generally, standards
compatibility pursuing is not necessarily fe
sic segfaults when USER environment variable is not set (so
getenv("USER") returns NULL):
$ unset USER
$ sic
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 02:41:30AM +0100, Sylvain BERTRAND wrote:
>
> >Lua is suckless, seriously. Just look at it.
>
> I know lua's code is suckless (unfortunately BSD-LIKE). But coding using lua
> is not. From there, lua won't reach heaven.
I haven't dug much into Lua source code, it seems to
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 08:15:04PM +0100, Sylvain BERTRAND wrote:
> > In heaven there is no GNU.
>
> Neither perl/python/ruby/lua/squirel/scheme/C++/java/C#.
> :)
Lua is suckless, seriously. Just look at it.
On Sat, Mar 06, 2010 at 01:50:39PM +0300, anonymous wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 11:17:08PM +0200, Dmitry Maluka wrote:
> > What is the profit from this abstraction? You call remove_scanned()
> > which moves host from host queue to scanned queue; output() takes hosts
> > f
On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 11:00:05PM +0300, anonymous wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 08:14:17PM +0200, Dmitry Maluka wrote:
> > Maybe I miss something, but why not just output results as far as hosts
> > are scanned? Output isn't that slow to use threads.
>
> The
On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 03:33:53PM +0300, anonymous wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 03:25:38PM -0600, eze.program...@gmail.com wrote:
> > I think this is a good project idea, and it would prove more than useful
> > also im looking forward to the simple port scanner, these project ideas
> > have ca
On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 09:48:37AM +, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> IMHO such a package manager is not needed, all we need are static
> executables of each tool what I try to achieve with static linux. Only
> exception are config files for daemons and tools, however this is all
> achievable using git
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 11:00:58PM +0100, Uriel wrote:
> There are retarded standards for all kinds of crap, too bad that there
> are thousands of standards and nobody follows them anyway.
>
> It is simple, the system user knows much better where shit is than the
> developer can dream knowing, if t
It just launches shell: "/bin/sh -c $CMD" where $CMD is your command
string. Shell parses this string and launches all specified commands,
with possible substitution, redirection, pipelining etc.
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 09:51:15PM +0100, Antoni Grzymala wrote:
> Peter John Hartman dixit (2010-01-03, 13:51):
>
> The tray “protocol” itself is a totally borken idea of the useless WIMP
> paradigm. A workaround for a workaround. Makes even less sense in the
> tagged dwm environment.
>
> As to
Looks simple and clean.
Makefile should contain uninstall rule:
diff -r 24c81cd5e477 makefile
--- a/makefile Sun Jan 03 15:37:05 2010 +0300
+++ b/makefile Sun Jan 03 19:45:35 2010 +0200
@@ -15,6 +15,9 @@
install: $(PROG)
cp $(PROG) $(DESTDIR)$(PREFIX)/bin/$(PROG)
+uninstall:
+
> I don't see the point of writing complex macros to subdue a language to
> my taste, when I could just as easily use another language.
Why not try Lisp as another language?
Macros are not necessarily kludges (though C macros are). They are a tool
for code simplification and decomposition. Anothe
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 03:47:46AM +, Aled Gest wrote:
> I totally agree that the C pre-processor sucks. It's ill thought out
> and needs replacing.
Any proposals?
> However, going back to what you were saying about
> you being able to subdue Lisp's syntax with macros, any language that
> req
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 06:16:00AM +1100, Jessta wrote:
> Lisp has the 'everything is a list' problem and there is lots of
> behaviour that doesn't fit well in to this. Consistancy can make
> things intuitive, but you shouldn't sacrifice intuitiveness for
> consistancy.
Lisp does not have this pro
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 03:32:37PM +, Aled Gest wrote:
> Not really. I don't like having forced polish notation for everything,
> if I did I'd just write everything in ASM.
You have no clue what Lisp is. It's a meta-language. See below.
> Well you've failed in that attempt. I just don't see a
Hi all!
We probably should mention newly created gmane.comp.misc.suckless
newsgroup at http://suckless.org/community.
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 10:01:38AM +1000, Jessta wrote:
> On 24/09/2009, QUINTIN Guillaume wrote:
> > Does YALSE have to support
> >
> > => a plugin system ? extensions ? scripting language (LUA ?) ? (so one
> > can embed a terminal within YALSE)
>
> No, it's a text editor. It edits text.
It's e
>From instruction on importing archives into Gmane
(http://gmane.org/import.php):
> Archives to be imported can be in one of two formats: Either a tar
> file of a one-message-per-file directory, where the files have names
> that increase numerically, or a Unix mbox file. No other formats are
> acc
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 07:57:38AM -0700, Thayer Williams wrote:
> That seems the most logical way to go, though I don't know why we'd
> keep the dwm archives and not the wmii archives--though I never
> subscribed to the latter so maybe I'm missing something.
It seems that old wmii newsgroup at G
Hello! Since merging dwm and wmii lists were merged into this list,
Gmane newsgroups are somewhat broken. Here is my conversation with
Wolfgang Schnerring, one of Gmane admins, from gmane.discuss group.
> From: Dmitry Maluka gmail.com>
> Subject: Newsgroup for dev suckless.org
>
37 matches
Mail list logo
