On Mon, 30 Nov 2015 01:10:04 -0600
xire.lue...@gmail.com wrote:
> And why is it netiquette to have line breaks instead
> of line wrapping client-side?
One more thing: Only people who use real computers to
do real work will notice this.
If you read your mails on an iPad, of course it will just
by
On Mon, 30 Nov 2015 01:10:04 -0600
xire.lue...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey Xire,
> Apologies that you dislike my current mailer;
> where is the archive?
http://lists.suckless.org/dev/
> And why is it netiquette to have line breaks instead
> of line wrapping client-side?
Because I don't want to resize
Apologies that you dislike my current mailer;
where is the archive?
And why is it netiquette to have line breaks instead
of line wrapping client-side?
XL
Omitting quotes since their format might be distasteful
to you as formatted by iOS mail.
Greetings.
> X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (13B143)
On Mon, 30 Nov 2015 07:24:24 +0100 xire.lue...@gmail.com wrote:
> [wrapped around for the sake of netiquette]
> For the sake of clarity/curiosity could you elaborate as to the flaws
> you find most heinous in C++? OOP languages in general? C++' implemen
For the sake of clarity/curiosity could you elaborate as to the flaws you find
most heinous in C++? OOP languages in general? C++' implementation of that?
Something else?
XL
> On 2015-11-30, at 00:07, Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> wrote:
>
> Greetings.
>
>> On Mon, 30 Nov 2015 07:07:38 +0
Greetings.
On Mon, 30 Nov 2015 07:07:38 +0100 Rashad Kanavath
wrote:
> Thanks. Unfortunately, choosing a language and it's compiler at work is not
> an thing which one can do when working on existing project.
>
> Personally, I would stick to lisp for fun projects or C (at work) if I had
> g
Thanks, i'll add it right now.
I tried just before I read your mail portal2, and it is completely
broken. If I find something, i'll let you know.
On 21 November 2015 at 19:36, Matthew of Boswell
wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Nov 2015 09:19:07 +
> Raphaël Proust wrote:
>
>> See this thread http://list
kenc
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 06:48:56PM +0200, Marc André Tanner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What follows is a quick overview of recent changes made to vis, my
> vim-like editor:
>
> https://github.com/martanne/vis
>
> I've been using it for some time now and most of my needs are covered.
> I hope to get a
On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 07:56:37AM -0500, Greg Reagle wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 12:22:18PM +0100, Rashad Kanavath wrote:
> > 2. when I have something printing on console (eg: an ongoing
> > compilation), it goes back to the last line or IOW it scroll down.
> > I was expecting the line to be
Thanks! I'll take a look at it.
On 21 November 2015 at 13:50, Hiltjo Posthuma wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 2:47 PM, Draco Metallium(Rodrigo S. Cañibano)
> wrote:
>> Good day.
>>
>> I was wondering, is there some way to force fullscreen apps to a tile?
>>
>> For example, in i3wm I could put a
Thanks. Unfortunately, choosing a language and it's compiler at work is not
an thing which one can do when working on existing project.
Personally, I would stick to lisp for fun projects or C (at work) if I had
given a choice.
On 11/29/15, Rashad Kanavath wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 1:
On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 12:22:18PM +0100, Rashad Kanavath wrote:
Hello Ivan,
First thanks for the useful scroll patch into st. I would say this
patch should be in the next version of st.
That's good news, but are you sure about it?
Good thing that I could reach the patch author. I tried the
On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 12:22:18PM +0100, Rashad Kanavath wrote:
> My issue with the scrollback patches are below:
>
> 1. slow scrolling.
FYI, I use dvtm for scrolling and it is plenty fast for me. I can hold down
the shift and PageUp keys and it goes quite fast.
> 2. when I have something prin
On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 12:59:32PM +0100, Rashad Kanavath wrote:
> Hello Dimitris,
>
> I saw some mails on hackers list with subject line containing "scc". Since
> then I looked into suckless page about the project. I took a wild guess
> that it is "simple c compiler"
>
> But couldn't find a
Hello Dimitris,
I saw some mails on hackers list with subject line containing "scc". Since
then I looked into suckless page about the project. I took a wild guess
that it is "simple c compiler"
But couldn't find anything in the page. So I guess it is not officially
release yet. And maybe a
> GCC C compiler is a virus, Then you are saying there is no
> alternative if I want a c or c++ compiler. ?
>
> Or is suckless planning to develop a new C compiler?
http://git.suckless.org/scc/
Most of them softwares listed on stuff that sucks has alternatives
given by suckless. There is a lot of other softwares/compilers etc..
that still sucks are not listed. this is because the list will be
endless!
I agree that. If you think the compiler or language is good enough. it
is better to upd
On Sun, 29 Nov 2015 12:28:20 +0100
Rashad Kanavath wrote:
> Could anyone recommend a c++ compiler that rocks?
Could anyone recommend a brand of toilet paper that rocks?
--
FRIGN
Hello all,
Could anyone recommend a c++ compiler that rocks?
from the site i got this
"""
C Compilers
GCC is the virus which has spread into nearly every Linux distribution
and has added its language extensions to be not easily replacable. As
of 2015 it is now written in C++ and so complete suck
Hello Ivan,
First thanks for the useful scroll patch into st. I would say this
patch should be in the next version of st.
Good thing that I could reach the patch author. I tried the patch and
was using it for last two weeks. So my feedback is worth only that
much.
My issue with the scrollback pa
21 matches
Mail list logo
