Thanks. Unfortunately, choosing a language and it's compiler at work is not an thing which one can do when working on existing project.
Personally, I would stick to lisp for fun projects or C (at work) if I had given a choice. On 11/29/15, Rashad Kanavath <mohammedrasha...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Greg Reagle <greg.rea...@umbc.edu> wrote: > >> On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 12:59:32PM +0100, Rashad Kanavath wrote: >> > Hello Dimitris, >> > >> > I saw some mails on hackers list with subject line containing "scc". >> Since >> > then I looked into suckless page about the project. I took a wild >> > guess >> > that it is "simple c compiler" >> > >> > But couldn't find anything in the page. So I guess it is not >> > officially >> > release yet. And maybe a simple question on the list could get me some >> > help. ;) >> > >> > Thank you very much. >> >> A simple search will find it immediately: >> https://duckduckgo.com/?q=suckless+scc. >> >> But you're right--it is C, not C++. I think that the vast majority, if >> not >> all, of the suckless developers think that C++ is irredeemably crappy. >> You >> would get a (slightly) better reception asking about Rust or Go. Search >> the >> list archives for some opinions about them. >> >> Personally, I'm not in love with C--it is too low level for my >> preference. >> But the suckless developers seem to be very dedicated to C. It is >> extremely >> fast to compile and to run, and produces extremely small executables. >> The >> alternatives tend to fall short on one or more of these criteria. >> > > Thanks. Unfortunately, choosing a language and it's compiler at work is not > an thing which one can do when working on existing project. > > Personally, I would stick to lisp for fun projects or C (at work) if I had > given a choice. > > > > -- > Regards, > Rashad > -- Regards, Rashad
