Anselm R Garbe said:
> I will create a formal release tonight.
Thanks!
--
Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
On 27/11/2014, M Farkas-Dyck wrote:
> • Unambiguous grammar
> • Low level
> • Tuples
> • Easy interface with C
Forgot one:
• Free declaration order
On 27/11/2014, Troels Henriksen wrote:
> The only implementation seems to be written in a pretty atrocious style:
> https://github.com/strake/pkc/b
M Farkas-Dyck writes:
> Given the comments on alternatives to C lately on dev@ I thought this
> a good time to introduce mine: http://k-lang.org/
The only implementation seems to be written in a pretty atrocious style:
https://github.com/strake/pkc/blob/master/CodeGen/Common.hs
Also - why care
On 27/11/2014, FRIGN wrote:
> No, bloody you!
...
I'm proposing the language. If you want to claim that my language
won't work, and fill out the checklist, feel free; I'll be over here,
using it.
On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 16:35:42 -0500
M Farkas-Dyck wrote:
> Who? "You" is a 2nd-person pronoun.
Richard Stallman of course.
...
No, bloody you!
--
FRIGN
On 27/11/2014, FRIGN wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 15:47:08 -0500
> M Farkas-Dyck wrote:
>>
>
> Fill out the checklist[0] already (just copy/paste it in your
> mail-client and tick) ;)
Who? "You" is a 2nd-person pronoun.
Hi,
Is there anything already done about it? I can't find
it on the git repository.
I'm very interested and I would like to help to bring
sta.li to reality.
Regards,
--
Henrique Lengler
On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 15:47:08 -0500
M Farkas-Dyck wrote:
>
Fill out the checklist[0] already (just copy/paste it in your
mail-client and tick) ;)
Cheers
FRIGN
[0]: http://colinm.org/language_checklist.html
--
FRIGN
On 27/11/2014, Wander Nauta wrote:
> What does your language have to offer? Is it safety? Expressiveness?
> Productivity? Ease of use?
• Unambiguous grammar
• Low level
• Tuples
• Easy interface with C
> Do K programs run faster than C programs?
Not in general.
> Also, what is a 'for loop afte
c makes hidden heap allocations? Wat
> On 27 Nov 2014, at 19:39, Wander Nauta wrote:
>
> What does your language have to offer? Is it safety? Expressiveness?
> Productivity? Ease of use? Do K programs run faster than C programs?
>
> Also, what is a 'for loop afterthot' (sic), why are the oper
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014, at 07:27, koneu wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> The two things that really make OO languages worthwhile in my opinion
> are polymorphism and inheritance. Doing polymorphism and data/code
> hiding in C is easy enough with const function pointers. You can just
> define public interface
What does your language have to offer? Is it safety? Expressiveness?
Productivity? Ease of use? Do K programs run faster than C programs?
Also, what is a 'for loop afterthot' (sic), why are the operators all
weird, why do you use parentheses where every C-like language uses
braces and why are inte
On 27/11/2014, M Farkas-Dyck wrote:
> This is very much a work in progress. In particular I not yet know how
> to do arrays, modules/includes, or macros sanely.
Or atomics.
Given the comments on alternatives to C lately on dev@ I thought this
a good time to introduce mine: http://k-lang.org/
The goal is a language appropriate for systems programs including
kernels, sans some flaws of C. This likely means no hidden heap
allocations.
This is very much a work in progre
On 27/11/2014, koneu wrote:
> Of course each "class" can only implement one interface.
Why? C lacking tuple types makes implementing more awkward but not impossible.
Greetings.
The two things that really make OO languages worthwhile in my opinion
are polymorphism and inheritance. Doing polymorphism and data/code
hiding in C is easy enough with const function pointers. You can just
define public interfaces in their own header like
struct interface {
v
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 10:55 PM, pancake wrote:
> Try Cello
>
I did try Cello. Cello turned out absolutely useless for me as
interfacing it with other C standard types is a PITA / completely
broken. After fiddling around for a while I got sick from what Cello
does with code I would write and ga
17 matches
Mail list logo
