On 27/11/2014, FRIGN <[email protected]> wrote: > No, bloody you! ...
I'm proposing the language. If you want to claim that my language won't work, and fill out the checklist, feel free; I'll be over here, using it.
- [dev] K, a low-level procedural imperative programming la... M Farkas-Dyck
- [dev] Re: K, a low-level procedural imperative progr... M Farkas-Dyck
- Re: [dev] K, a low-level procedural imperative progr... Wander Nauta
- Re: [dev] K, a low-level procedural imperative p... pancake
- Re: [dev] K, a low-level procedural imperative p... M Farkas-Dyck
- Re: [dev] K, a low-level procedural imperati... FRIGN
- Re: [dev] K, a low-level procedural impe... M Farkas-Dyck
- Re: [dev] K, a low-level procedural... FRIGN
- Re: [dev] K, a low-level proced... M Farkas-Dyck
- Re: [dev] K, a low-level procedural imperati... M Farkas-Dyck
- Re: [dev] K, a low-level procedural impe... Martti Kühne
- Re: [dev] K, a low-level procedural... M Farkas-Dyck
- Re: [dev] K, a low-level procedural imperative progr... Troels Henriksen
