On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 12:11:06AM +0200, ilf wrote:
> rxvt: http://i.imgur.com/6Dimc.png
Default rxvt-unicode doesn't have 256 color support, you'd need patches
for that.
--
Marvin Vek
-
printk (KERN_ERR ": Oops - your private data area is hosed!
", ...)
linux-2.6.6/drivers/net/ewrk3.
http://st.suckless.org/goals sais:
| Confirmed st features
| # 256 colour support (Arg)
I'm wondering, if this is already implemented.
If so, what do i need to set?
Right now, a colortest looks like this for me:
xterm: http://i.imgur.com/oP7SK.png
rxvt: http://i.imgur.com/6Dimc.png
st:
On 6 Jun 2010, at 19:26, Antoni Grzymala wrote:
Ethan Grammatikidis dixit (2010-06-06, 12:37):
What is a minor annoyance for me is how the “m”-mode in dwm is
implemented. The clients that aren’t in focus are visible underneath
the focused window. At least I think that’s how it’s done, since
ilf dixit (2010-06-05, 13:32):
> On 06-05 09:34, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> >in tiled mode xpdf works as it used to, so i'm not terribly annoyed
>
> Only not full-screened Xpdf works as before, full-screened Xpd does
> not, as described.
>
> I use an alias xpdff='xpdf -fullscreen'.
I'd hate that, b
Ethan Grammatikidis dixit (2010-06-06, 12:37):
> >What is a minor annoyance for me is how the “m”-mode in dwm is
> >implemented. The clients that aren’t in focus are visible underneath
> >the focused window. At least I think that’s how it’s done, since I can
> >see Chromium at the bottom of urxvt
Hi,
I have been using nmh for quite some time, and now I wonder if dmc is able to
read the folder format nmh uses for managing mails. If not, is it planned to
implement it? I'd like to keep my folders compatible to nmh and would
preferrably not convert them back to maildir.
Kind regards,
Moritz
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 11:34:08AM +0200, Alexander Teinum wrote:
> I actually prefer cycling between the applications that I work with,
> and I was going to create an alt+tab patch to give it the traditional
> alt+tab behavior. Now I don’t have to. Thanks!
You're welcome!
> What is a minor annoya
On 6 Jun 2010, at 10:34, Alexander Teinum wrote:
What is a minor annoyance for me is how the “m”-mode in dwm is
implemented. The clients that aren’t in focus are visible underneath
the focused window. At least I think that’s how it’s done, since I can
see Chromium at the bottom of urxvtc.
Th
> I think I’m going to keep all the clients that I work with in one tab.
> Spotify, background processes etc. can stay in one of the other tabs.
>
Tag, not tab. ;)
I’ll go and see if I can find find some caffeine…
--
Best regards,
Alexander Teinum
Wow.
I actually prefer cycling between the applications that I work with,
and I was going to create an alt+tab patch to give it the traditional
alt+tab behavior. Now I don’t have to. Thanks!
I think I’m going to keep all the clients that I work with in one tab.
Spotify, background processes etc.
10 matches
Mail list logo
