On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 11:34:08AM +0200, Alexander Teinum wrote: > I actually prefer cycling between the applications that I work with, > and I was going to create an alt+tab patch to give it the traditional > alt+tab behavior. Now I don’t have to. Thanks! You're welcome!
> What is a minor annoyance for me is how the “m”-mode in dwm is > implemented. The clients that aren’t in focus are visible underneath > the focused window. At least I think that’s how it’s done, since I can > see Chromium at the bottom of urxvtc. I'm not sure to understand correct this behaviour. If "m"-mode means the default meta-m keystroke (monocle layout in vanilla config.h), how can you see more than on client in monocle. Does your focused window is floating? > One thing that might be a bit off-topic, but I have been thinking > about the placement of the left alt-key lately. I have caps lock > mapped as control, and I only use the caps key and the left alt for > controlling stuff – i.e. I don’t care about the Windows- or the > Fn-key, or anything to the left of the left alt. I have observed that > both of my thumbs rest on the space key, but I only hit space with the > right thumb. What would make the keyboard more ergonomic for my use > was if half of the space key was an alt key. What a waste of space > (pun) the way that it is now. I have to move my thumb 2–3 cm into an > awkward position every time that I want to press alt – which is > something that I do very often. Imagine doing alt+j and alt+k without > moving the thumb… What about place your awkward key to either one of the shift keys (that you use less often, or don't use at all :-)). I can't think a better solution, except to use F1[0-2] if you only have 9 or less tags; this, though, sounds uncomfortable as well. I'll think a bit about this in order to improve my layout too. Thanks for the hint. Regards, Claudio M. Alessi
