Ethan Grammatikidis dixit (2010-06-06, 12:37): > >What is a minor annoyance for me is how the “m”-mode in dwm is > >implemented. The clients that aren’t in focus are visible underneath > >the focused window. At least I think that’s how it’s done, since I can > >see Chromium at the bottom of urxvtc. > > This is why I suggested st not bother with size hints, although it > ought to be fixed in the WM really. A quick fix might be to put all > non-visible windows in iconified state. ion3 does this (although it > doesn't really need to), and it seems not to have any problems.
You're welcome to disrespect hints at dwm level (resizehints=false) in which case urxvtc will truly cover the full screen. Hints make sense though, and not using them may mess up the terminal occasionally – this has been of course argued about and discussed here a million times. Iconising clients *might* be a solution, though I'm not certain whether I'd be more scared than comforted *not* seeing another client from under a non-fullscreen window (be it terminal or anything else). -- [a]
