On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 2:29 PM, Kurt H Maier wrote:
> Is it time for the weekly distribution pissing match already? Time
> just flies by
>
>
> --
> # Kurt H Maier
Not a pissing match, just curious since I saw a lot of people mention
my distro of choice ArchLinux.
Different strokes for different
Arch Linux on everything 686, Debian Lenny on everything not 686.
--
Ian Daniher
OLPCinci Repair Coordinator
Olin College Student, Class of 2013
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 01:12, Samuel Baldwin wrote:
> Archlinux on several boxes here.
>
> --
> Samuel 'Shardz' Baldwin -
> staticfree.info/~samuel<
Is it time for the weekly distribution pissing match already? Time
just flies by
--
# Kurt H Maier
Archlinux on several boxes here.
--
Samuel 'Shardz' Baldwin - staticfree.info/~samuel
I've been following the list for a while and I'm curious what everyone
is using as their distro of choice? Also, which distro do you feel is
most suckless?
Personally, I run Archlinux on my home and work boxes, Rockbox on my
old iPod nano and android on my G1.
I played with Linux from Scratch and
On Jul 23, 2009 at 04:41 PM, hessi...@hessiess.com wrote:
> > the thing is that i'll love to try archlinux
> Arch won't work, it has no support for ARM processors, Gentoo maby?
> I cannot give any advice regarding a WM, but with the lack of a keyboard
> you are prittymuch stuck with a tabbed/ float
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 11:44 AM, Donald Allen wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 11:27 AM, Donald Allen wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 8:19 AM, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
>>> On 7/23/09, Donald Allen wrote:
fix it, when (in my opinion) a reasonable fix exists (change
alt- to ctrl-alt-), even
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 6:35 PM, Leandro
Chescotta wrote:
> yeah, im waiting to see with which window manager google develop for their
> google chrome operating system... i think is that or android :P then...
You don't need a window manager when your shell process is a browser
in the frambuffer.
yeah, im waiting to see with which window manager google develop for their
google chrome operating system... i think is that or android :P then...
i can't stop to see the tegra prototypes in youtube :P battery life that
last days, pocket portability and no moving parts... i would love to have
mult
Kris Maglione wrote:
the mean time, you can either install plan9port (sudo pkg_add -r
plan9port), or use another rc script (wmiirc, or
alternative_wmiircs/python).
Thanks for your help, after removing 9base I installed plan9port
(20080909) and wmii works again!
I don't quite understand wh
> the thing is that i'll love to try archlinux
Arch won't work, it has no support for ARM processors, Gentoo maby?
I cannot give any advice regarding a WM, but with the lack of a keyboard
you are prittymuch stuck with a tabbed/ floating interface. Personally I
cannot imagane myself ever using anyth
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 07:43:49PM +, Michal wrote:
Hello.
I need some help with getting latest snapshot to run on FreeBSD
(9base-b20060209, dmenu-4.0, libixp-0.5).
Latest wmii release (3.6) works like a charm on the same machine but
when I install wmii+ixp-20090703 something is not right,
Hello.
I need some help with getting latest snapshot to run on FreeBSD
(9base-b20060209, dmenu-4.0, libixp-0.5).
Latest wmii release (3.6) works like a charm on the same machine but
when I install wmii+ixp-20090703 something is not right, i.e. there is
nothing on a status bar (just "1" indicatin
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 11:27 AM, Donald Allen wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 8:19 AM, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
>> On 7/23/09, Donald Allen wrote:
>>> fix it, when (in my opinion) a reasonable fix exists (change
>>> alt- to ctrl-alt-), even for keyboards
>>> without the Windows key.
>>
>> editing ct
> > anyway, i could agree with the change if it's just
> > #define MODKEY Mod1Mask|ControlMask
imho the best default is Mod1 - it's a lot less annoying than Ctrl+Alt,
in apps Esc+key can often be used instead. Ctrl+Alt is not a good
default, because it'll induce EMACS-fingers and scare off the use
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 11:27 AM, Donald Allen wrote:
>
>
> I believe this would have the effect of changing alt- to
> ctrl-alt- and also alt-shift- to
> ctrl-alt-shift-, yes?
>
> If so, that makes sense to me. It preserves the current consistency,
> which my fix does not, so in that way it is les
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 8:19 AM, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> On 7/23/09, Donald Allen wrote:
>> fix it, when (in my opinion) a reasonable fix exists (change
>> alt- to ctrl-alt-), even for keyboards
>> without the Windows key.
>
> editing ctrl-alt out from the default config is more work than just
> ch
On 7/23/09, Donald Allen wrote:
> fix it, when (in my opinion) a reasonable fix exists (change
> alt- to ctrl-alt-), even for keyboards
> without the Windows key.
editing ctrl-alt out from the default config is more work than just
changing the mod key definition
> window manager with defaults th
2009/7/23 Donald Allen :
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 5:13 AM, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
>> We got config.h for that. The default key bindings won't change ;)
>
> As I observed when I began this thread, your defaults conflict
> directly with a well-established UI convention of many applications
> (the und
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 5:13 AM, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> 2009/7/22 Donald Allen :
>> I think the default key bindings for dwm are a unfortunate in some
>> cases. For example, alt-f, a natural choice for *f*loat mode,
>> conflicts with pulling down the File menu in many applications from
>> the keyb
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 4:18 AM, Jimmy Tang wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 08:07:42PM -0400, Donald Allen wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 7:23 PM, Donald Chai wrote:
>> > On Jul 22, 2009, at 2:22 PM, Donald Allen wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 3:25 PM, Michael wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Do
2009/7/22 Donald Allen :
> I think the default key bindings for dwm are a unfortunate in some
> cases. For example, alt-f, a natural choice for *f*loat mode,
> conflicts with pulling down the File menu in many applications from
> the keyboard. alt-T similarly conflicts with using the Tools menu in
Donald Allen dixit (2009-07-22, 20:07):
> > people change the setting to Mod2Mask to use the Windows key, but the
> > current default of Mod1Mask will work out of the box for anyone who doesn't
> > have a Windows/Apple/diamond key.
>
> That's true. But it also conflicts with a widely-available UI
On (22/07/09 10:30), Donald Allen wrote:
> Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 10:30:34 -0400
> From: Donald Allen
> To: dev mail list
> Subject: [dev] dwm default bindings
> List-Id: dev mail list
>
> I think the default key bindings for dwm are a unfortunate in some
> cases. For example, alt-f, a natural
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 08:07:42PM -0400, Donald Allen wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 7:23 PM, Donald Chai wrote:
> > On Jul 22, 2009, at 2:22 PM, Donald Allen wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 3:25 PM, Michael wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Donald Allen wrote:
>
> I realize that these bindin
25 matches
Mail list logo
