On Sat, 2009-06-20 17:27:48 +0100, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> An initial version of the new xinerama support is committed into hg,
> it's not finished/polished yet, but the basics are usable already.
> During the development I decided to have a bar per monitor, instead of
> just one bar. It's less con
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 12:21 AM, Antony Jepson wrote:
> I'm not sure if this has been asked before (although I did do a quick
> search of ) but what distributions do you guys use on
> a daily basis? I recently built a new computer and I'm looking for a
> good OS to install on there.
>
> I've been
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 3:28 AM, Jack Woehr wrote:
> Enno Boland (Gottox) wrote:
>>
>> 2009/6/21 Uriel :
>>
>>>
>>> Excessive and naive obsession with code reuse is one of the major
>>> sources of gratuitous complexity in the software industry.
>>>
>
> Ooh! Nice. "Having an idea and being able to e
It's a metadistribution. The entire point is to use it how you see fit
and it tries to help you do that, but it by no means holds your hand
while doing it.
I don't think "metadistribution" has an actual application here. I
see things like LFS or JeOS as metadistributions; 'being configur
Enno Boland (Gottox) wrote:
2009/6/21 Uriel :
Excessive and naive obsession with code reuse is one of the major
sources of gratuitous complexity in the software industry.
Ooh! Nice. "Having an idea and being able to execute it in code"
is in 75% of cases much more serendipitous than rot
I agree with uriel. In my opinion just seperate the drawing code from
the rest of the code by putting it into its own functions. This should
be sufficient. Please avoid using extra libraries.
2009/6/21 Uriel :
> Well, it might work, but lets say that I'm skeptical.
>
> Also I wonder if the gain of
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 8:06 PM, Leandro
Chescotta wrote:
> Why freebsd is not suckless? not arguing, but i don't know a lot about
> BSD's, so, i wanna know
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 3:11 AM, Fernan Bolando
> wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 4:25 AM, Uriel wrote:
>>> Agreed, OpenBSD is far fr
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 10:31:21PM +0100, Kevin Nagel wrote:
is it possible to expand dmenu into sth similar like enso
(http://www.humanized.com/enso/)
The idea seems absurd. We already have unix commands to perform
all of the requisite functionality. And, with dmenu, you've no
need to hold t
On 6/21/09, Kevin Nagel wrote:
> is it possible to expand dmenu into sth similar like enso
> (http://www.humanized.com/enso/)
"You just hold down the Caps Lock key and type an Enso command, which
is displayed in a translucent overlay. Once the command is typed, you
simply release the Caps Lock ke
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 5:31 PM, Kevin Nagel wrote:
> Hello,
>
> is it possible to expand dmenu into sth similar like enso
> (http://www.humanized.com/enso/)
>
> Regards,
>
> Kev
What does enso do that dmenu doesn't?
For things like definitions and math, create some scripts that wrap
shell utilit
On 6/21/09, Kevin Nagel wrote:
> I am a wmii-2.5 user and like the tabbing concept much more than the
> stacking concept in wmii-3. However, I've considered using dwm, but
> would like to have these features there as well. Also the dynamic
> control of creating/deleting workspaces and not using ta
Hello,
is it possible to expand dmenu into sth similar like enso
(http://www.humanized.com/enso/)
Regards,
Kev
Hello,
I am a wmii-2.5 user and like the tabbing concept much more than the
stacking concept in wmii-3. However, I've considered using dwm, but
would like to have these features there as well. Also the dynamic
control of creating/deleting workspaces and not using tagging. Is
this possible and how
hiro dixit (2009-06-21, 22:13):
> > smelly anyhow, though useful.
>
> Useful in creating jobs, right.
> I will try to keep this in mind, thank you very much.
>
> Scat, though smelly, is also very useful as a fertilizer.
Definitely. There's a hint (or more) of scat that I enjoy in some of the
fi
> smelly anyhow, though useful.
Useful in creating jobs, right.
I will try to keep this in mind, thank you very much.
Scat, though smelly, is also very useful as a fertilizer.
Uriel dixit (2009-06-21, 20:39):
> Bash scripts are one of the worst venereal diseases to even infest
> *nix systems.
I wouldn't exaggerate. Most bash scripts don't use bashisms and could
just as well be “good ol' sh” scripts as you like to call them, though I
don't personallly see what so “good”
Well, it might work, but lets say that I'm skeptical.
Also I wonder if the gain of moving the handful of lines of code
involved in drawing dwm's GUI into a library would really be worth it.
Excessive and naive obsession with code reuse is one of the major
sources of gratuitous complexity in the s
This list has become like the internet's kindergarten...
And Erik Naggum is dead, just when the world needs him most, what a sad day :(
uriel
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 6:26 AM, Kris Maglione wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 12:18:15PM +0800, Ludovic Guégan wrote:
>>
>> Same to me!
>
> Unsubscribe
Bash scripts are one of the worst venereal diseases to even infest *nix systems.
Learn to use good ol' sh, or switch to rc, but stop spreading the bash
braindamage.
uriel
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 5:55 PM, hiro<23h...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 4:01 PM, James PIC wrote:
>>
>
It really has degenerated into an a pissing contest so I gave up.
Thomas
On Jun 21, 2009, at 11:55 AM, hiro <23h...@googlemail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 4:01 PM, James PIC wrote:
Man bash
man portage
I'm pretty happy that both of those commands fail on all my hand
calculators.
On Sun, 21 Jun 2009 17:43:40 +0200
hiro <23h...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > As said, don't miss that all these efforts will be kept at
> its most minimalist solution.
>
> Easily said...
Easily done...
> > Separating interface and implementation...
>
> Not always sane.
In most cases it is. Figu
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 4:01 PM, James PIC wrote:
>
> Man bash
> man portage
I'm pretty happy that both of those commands fail on all my hand calculators.
They are great Systems. I never had to reboot or upgrade anything,
cause it's so fucking less sucking. And it works with solar power!
You gu
> As said, don't miss that all these efforts will be kept at
its most minimalist solution.
Easily said...
> It is the Sensible Solution[tm] to
> do it the way he suggests.
...
> Separating interface and implementation...
Not always sane.
In this case I agree that it's rather not worth it.
If
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 9:01 AM, James PIC wrote:
> Man bash
> man portage
I'm pretty happy that both of those commands fail on all my systems
Man bash
man portage
On Jun 20, 2009 2:50 PM, "Kurt H Maier" wrote:
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 4:22 AM, Anselm R Garbe wrote: >
That way I can set up a ...
Ubuntu is an utter nightmare to use on anything but a "workstation"
system. They ship broken packages, break currently-working packages,
fail
On (21/06/09 08:39), Randy Morris wrote:
> To: dev mail list
> From: Randy Morris
> Subject: Re: [dev] unsubscribe
> Reply-To: dev mail list
> List-Id: dev mail list
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
>
> On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 03:22:56PM +1100, Roman Belikin wrote:
> > I would be happy t
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 03:22:56PM +1100, Roman Belikin wrote:
> I would be happy to unsubscribe myself, BUT it's don't work. I sent
> million letters to
> dev+unsubscr...@suckless.org etc.
> Please, talk me, what i have to do for unsubcribe
>
> Thanks a lot
>
I've also been unable to unsubscribe
On Sun, 21 Jun 2009 02:56:46 +0200
Uriel wrote:
> I thought we had agreed against having multiple drawing backends...
> this will add considerable complexity for no gain at all.
you misunderstand. Read Anselms mail. It is the Sensible Solution[tm] to
do it the way he suggests. Separating interfa
Because it is not bloated with httpd and perl in the _basesystem_ ? :-)
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Leandro Chescotta <
leandro.chesco...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Why freebsd is not suckless? not arguing, but i don't know a lot about
> BSD's, so, i wanna know
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 3:11 AM
Why freebsd is not suckless? not arguing, but i don't know a lot about
BSD's, so, i wanna know
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 3:11 AM, Fernan Bolando wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 4:25 AM, Uriel wrote:
>> Agreed, OpenBSD is far from perfect, but it sucks much less than any
>> other *nix system out th
2009/6/20 Michael :
> Anselm R Garbe wrote:
>> Afterwards the next item will be the interface integration to enable
>> different drawing backends, which will ease porting to cairo/pango or
>> xft as well. The advantage is, that the same interface will be used in
>> st and dmenu as well. This is bas
31 matches
Mail list logo
