On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 8:06 PM, Leandro Chescotta<leandro.chesco...@gmail.com> wrote: > Why freebsd is not suckless? not arguing, but i don't know a lot about > BSD's, so, i wanna know > > > On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 3:11 AM, Fernan Bolando<fernanbola...@mailc.net> > wrote: >> On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 4:25 AM, Uriel<lost.gob...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Agreed, OpenBSD is far from perfect, but it sucks much less than any >>> other *nix system out there this days. >>> >>> Peace >>> >>> uriel >>> >>> On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 5:53 PM, Jack Woehr<j...@well.com> wrote: >>>> There's already a BSD distrib that sucks less. It's called OpenBSD! >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Jack J. Woehr # I run for public office from time to time. It's >>>> like >>>> http://www.well.com/~jax # working out at the gym, you sweat a lot, don't >>>> get >>>> http://www.softwoehr.com # anywhere, and you fall asleep easily afterwards. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> crux distro for linux >> openbsd or netbsd for bsd >> >>
My comment on using openbsd or netbsd versus freebsd is purely because I have not used freebsd myself. Crux and Obsd already has almost everything I need in a <200MB base system, so I only needed to download a few package to configure it for specific purpose. I have always had the impression that freebsd wants me to download >600MB of data to install. If they created a picobsd distro then I would have probably prefered using that for some of my stuff. fernan -- http://www.fernski.com
