Because it is not bloated with httpd and perl in the _basesystem_ ? :-) On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Leandro Chescotta < leandro.chesco...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Why freebsd is not suckless? not arguing, but i don't know a lot about > BSD's, so, i wanna know > > > On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 3:11 AM, Fernan Bolando<fernanbola...@mailc.net> > wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 4:25 AM, Uriel<lost.gob...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Agreed, OpenBSD is far from perfect, but it sucks much less than any > >> other *nix system out there this days. > >> > >> Peace > >> > >> uriel > >> > >> On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 5:53 PM, Jack Woehr<j...@well.com> wrote: > >>> There's already a BSD distrib that sucks less. It's called OpenBSD! > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Jack J. Woehr # I run for public office from time to time. > It's > >>> like > >>> http://www.well.com/~jax <http://www.well.com/%7Ejax> # working out at > the gym, you sweat a lot, don't > >>> get > >>> http://www.softwoehr.com # anywhere, and you fall asleep easily > afterwards. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > crux distro for linux > > openbsd or netbsd for bsd > > > > > > -- > > http://www.fernski.com > > > > > > > > -- > > --------------------------------- > http://aleyscha.spaces.live.com/ > > ""El lugar mas peligroso de todos es el cielo... En el, cada > pensamiento se hace realidad... sea bueno o malo... creas tu paraiso o > tu infierno"" > >
