Re: [dev] uzbl

Or maybe the Gecko people just want us to think they're rending pages correctly, and they're not. It's a conspiracy I tell you. They just want us all to have to use firefox. The only problem I'm having with uzbl is cookies, which is something I need to configure. Other than that I think I'm going

Re: [dev] uzbl

I have gtk+-2.16.1 from ~x86. On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 11:07:02PM +0200, Yoshi Rokuko wrote: > On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 03:27:36PM -0400, Jacob Todd wrote: > > I've been able to get uzbl to compile on my gentoo machine. So far > > good for you, my build failed because my gtk+2-2.12.12 seemes to be

Re: [dev] uzbl

On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 03:27:36PM -0400, Jacob Todd wrote: > I've been able to get uzbl to compile on my gentoo machine. So far good for you, my build failed because my gtk+2-2.12.12 seemes to be too old ... what kind of bleeding edge gtk2 does uzbl need (?) regards, y0shi

Re: [dev] uzbl

On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 03:27:36PM -0400, Jacob Todd wrote: it seems to render pages like slashdot faster than firefox with noscript and flashblock. KHTML and WebKit render most pages faster than Firefox, but they don't necessarilly render them correctly. -- Kris Maglione C++: an octopus ma

Re: [dev] uzbl

On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 2:27 PM, Jacob Todd wrote: > it seems to render pages like slashdot faster than firefox with noscript and > flashblock. On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 2:27 PM, Jacob Todd wrote: > it seems javascript is turned off. makes sense to me -- # Kurt H Maier

Re: [dev] How to make R's windows floating?

use "R Graphics" instead of "R*". it's only substrings, not pattern matching On Mon 25 May 2009 - 02:04PM, Wu, Yue wrote: > On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 09:51:59AM +0800, bill lam wrote: > > On Sun, 24 May 2009, Wu, Yue wrote: > > > Hi, I tried to make all of R[www.r-project.org] relative stuffs, lik

Re: [dev] uzbl

Dieter Plaetinck wrote: > > http://github.com/Dieterbe/uzbl/blob/experimental/docs/multiple-instances-management > > Dieter > Yeap, I have read it already, and why I noted that uzbl people probably won't implement buffers-like style of management.

Re: [dev] [wmii] New guide in hg

On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 10:29:55AM +0200, pascal wrote: Hi In section 2.1.1, "Press (M-space) ... (M-return) ...", M should be Meta key (the windoze key), but on a fresh install of wmii-hg, it's the Alt key which has to be used (on my system at leat), it's a bit confusing... Yes, I know, but I

Re: [dev] [wmii] New guide in hg

On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 09:41:18AM +0200, Dieter Plaetinck wrote: 1.1 concepts under "Managed", maybe you could briefly mention tiled an stacked. (i know they are explained later on, but mentioning them could be useful) Well, there's really no tiled mode, and I did briefly mention stacking, bu

Re: [dev] uzbl

I've been able to get uzbl to compile on my gentoo machine. So far the browser has been working just fine with my tor + polipo setup, fonts look nice (but it doesn't seem like you can change them yet), and it seems to render pages like slashdot faster than firefox with noscript and flashblock. The

Re: [dev] compile error in latest hg

On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 09:01:49PM +0200, Stefan Pampel wrote: On my debian sid I've installed lsb-build-desktop3 which is needed for the new Xft support (rev 2458). It installs a lot of libdevel packages but it's the only way I found to make it working... It installs pkg-config which is needed s

Re: [dev] compile error in latest hg

On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 02:18:58PM +0200, steph wrote: > Stefan Pampel : > > since the last checkouts on wmii-hg i got the following complile errors: > > make deb > > > > CC cmd/wmii9menu.o > > In file included from cmd/wmii9menu.c:49: > > ../include/x11.h:9:25: error: X11/Xft/Xft.h: No such file

Re: [dev] make framework for wmii

On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 02:24:36AM +0900, KIMURA Masaru wrote: O.K. Sorry for poking half-baked one. Like you said, separating X11 dep is a way to go. BTW I also interested in p9p's AUTOLIB approach, so any technical reasons why you didn't embed/get library dependency into/from source files thems

Re: [dev] make framework for wmii

2009/5/26 Kris Maglione : > On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 11:38:47PM +0900, KIMURA Masaru wrote: >> >> I'm now browsing wmii hg2467. >> a) default config.mk has X11PACKAGES=xft and INCX11=$$(pkg-config >> --cflags $(X11PACKAGES)) >> b) cmd/Makefile has redundant $$(pkg-config --libs $(X11PACKAGES)) w/ >>

Re: [dev] uzbl

On Mon, 25 May 2009 01:41:10 +0400 Michael wrote: > sta...@cs.tu-berlin.de wrote: > > * Michael [2009-05-24 21:55]: > > > Although concept of one page per instance isn't very useful for > > > me right now. I use dwm, and I want web page be full screen, but > > > if I'm not in monocle mode, pages

Re: [dev] Kazekahase?

I think it has gotten better. I have only been using it since yesterday but it seems great. I like webkit. I know you can use gecko but I like webkit better. On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Kurt H Maier wrote: > I used to use kazehakase regularly, because they kept promising gtk+ > webcore

Re: [dev] Kazekahase?

I used to use kazehakase regularly, because they kept promising gtk+ webcore support. IIRC back then it entirely depended on having a full mozilla/seamonkey/firefox install present just to build at all, even if you compiled it with a different rendering engine. Then ,after the build was done, you

Re: [dev] Kazekahase?

Benjamin Conner wrote: hmmm. It works for me. I like it now (.5.4) It's working with everything. I love those UI levels too. I keep it on medium mostly. On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 11:19 AM, pancake > wrote: Benjamin Conner wrote: Anyone tried this ligh

Re: [dev] make framework for wmii

On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 11:38:47PM +0900, KIMURA Masaru wrote: I'm now browsing wmii hg2467. a) default config.mk has X11PACKAGES=xft and INCX11=$$(pkg-config --cflags $(X11PACKAGES)) b) cmd/Makefile has redundant $$(pkg-config --libs $(X11PACKAGES)) w/ hardcoded -lXext c) cmd/click/Makefile has

Re: [dev] Kazekahase?

hmmm. It works for me. I like it now (.5.4) It's working with everything. I love those UI levels too. I keep it on medium mostly. On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 11:19 AM, pancake wrote: > Benjamin Conner wrote: > >> Anyone tried this lightweight browser? Idk if it's the lgithest around >> but it's c

Re: [dev] Kazekahase?

On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 11:15:21AM -0400, Benjamin Conner wrote: > Anyone tried this lightweight browser? Idk if it's the lgithest around but > it's certainly faster than FF and I like it alot. I compiled it with webkit > and it seems to work for everything I use. I just kinda want to see what >

Re: [dev] Kazekahase?

Benjamin Conner wrote: Anyone tried this lightweight browser? Idk if it's the lgithest around but it's certainly faster than FF and I like it alot. I compiled it with webkit and it seems to work for everything I use. I just kinda want to see what everyone thinks of it. http://kazekahase.sf.j

[dev] Kazekahase?

Anyone tried this lightweight browser? Idk if it's the lgithest around but it's certainly faster than FF and I like it alot. I compiled it with webkit and it seems to work for everything I use. I just kinda want to see what everyone thinks of it. http://kazekahase.sf.jp

[dev] make framework for wmii

Hi, I'm now browsing wmii hg2467. a) default config.mk has X11PACKAGES=xft and INCX11=$$(pkg-config --cflags $(X11PACKAGES)) b) cmd/Makefile has redundant $$(pkg-config --libs $(X11PACKAGES)) w/ hardcoded -lXext c) cmd/click/Makefile has hardcoded -lXtst in LDFLAGS d) test/Makefile has $(LIBX1

Re: [dev] on a potential libc replacement

Kurt H Maier wrote: http://libposix.sourceforge.net/ It's an implementation of POSIX 2008 -- and nothing else! This is the sort of thing we can use to build a suckless coreutils package, in my opinion. $ git clone git://libposix.git.sourceforge.net/gitroot/libposix Initialized empty Git re

[dev] on a potential libc replacement

http://libposix.sourceforge.net/ It's an implementation of POSIX 2008 -- and nothing else! This is the sort of thing we can use to build a suckless coreutils package, in my opinion. -- # Kurt H Maier

Re: [dev] dwm only?

Hi there, I'm not sure what is so difficult to understand about this move to d...@. Previously, dwm@ was used for plenty valuable off-topic discussions as well, besides dwm's own discussion, and the move to dev@ is logical, since there are more software projects from suckless.org (and more to com

Re: [dev] dwm only?

On Mon, 25 May 2009 15:03:30 +0200 Uriel wrote: Subject: dwm title bars similar to wmii title bars Body: I like how wmii draws window title bars and I was wondering if there is dwm patch available to do the same. Just an example. We had perfect two lists and we had to break them so now we must

Re: [dev] dwm only?

I have done the following setup in Gmail that simulate the dwm list: Filters: Matches: list:"dev.suckless.org" Do this: Skip Inbox, Apply label "dwm" Matches: subject:wmii list:"dev.suckless.org" Do this: Skip Inbox, Delete it Label: dwm On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 3:38 PM, pmar

Re: [dev] dwm only?

> Most email filtering tools (eg., procmail) allow to trivially match > strings in the body of an email rather than in the subject. (I'm > amazed that I need to point this out). I can mention wmii in the body of an email and not be strictly wmii-related.

Re: [dev] uzbl

2009/5/24 Kris Maglione : > On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 10:30:46PM +0200, Dieter Plaetinck wrote: >> Weird.  I fetched the wmii 3.6 tarball, but it only contains wmii9menu. >> no wimenu. > > Yeah, it wasn't in 3.6—I think every wmii release to date has been done > behind my back, and 3.6 is old. I'm wo

Re: [dev] dwm only?

2009/5/25 Benjamin Conner : > I use gmail though.  I'll just make another account. There are filters and labels in gmail. Kind regards, Anselm

Re: [dev] dwm only?

On Mon, 25 May 2009, Anselm R Garbe wrote: > Hi there, > > I was on vacation during the last days, so I didn't respond to this > thread yet. However, here is what I think we should do if possible, as > a "best practice", if you like. > > If your topic is strictly dwm-related mention this in the s

Re: [dev] dwm only?

I use gmail though. I'll just make another account. On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 9:03 AM, Uriel wrote: > Most email filtering tools (eg., procmail) allow to trivially match > strings in the body of an email rather than in the subject. (I'm > amazed that I need to point this out). > > uriel > > On Mo

Re: [dev] dwm only?

Most email filtering tools (eg., procmail) allow to trivially match strings in the body of an email rather than in the subject. (I'm amazed that I need to point this out). uriel On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 12:40 PM, Michael wrote: > Anselm R Garbe wrote: >> If your topic is strictly dwm-related ment

Re: [dev] dwm only?

2009/5/25 pmarin : > On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 12:40 PM, Michael wrote: >> Anselm R Garbe wrote: >>> If your topic is strictly dwm-related mention this in the subject >>> (then people can match for "dwm"). >>> >>> If your topic is strictly wmii-related mention this in the subject as >>> well (people

Re: [dev] dwm only?

On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 12:40 PM, Michael wrote: > Anselm R Garbe wrote: >> If your topic is strictly dwm-related mention this in the subject >> (then people can match for "dwm"). >> >> If your topic is strictly wmii-related mention this in the subject as >> well (people can match for "wmii" then)

Re: [dev] dwm only?

Anselm R Garbe wrote: > If your topic is strictly dwm-related mention this in the subject > (then people can match for "dwm"). > > If your topic is strictly wmii-related mention this in the subject as > well (people can match for "wmii" then). I don't think newcomers will follow this instructions

Re: [dev] dwm only?

On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 5:55 AM, Anselm R Garbe wrote: > Hi there, > > I was on vacation during the last days, so I didn't respond to this > thread yet. However, here is what I think we should do if possible, as > a "best practice", if you like. > > If your topic is strictly dwm-related mention th

Re: [dev] dwm only?

Hi there, I was on vacation during the last days, so I didn't respond to this thread yet. However, here is what I think we should do if possible, as a "best practice", if you like. If your topic is strictly dwm-related mention this in the subject (then people can match for "dwm"). If your topic

Re: [dev] How to make R's windows floating?

On Mon, 25 May 2009, Wu, Yue wrote: > On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 02:47:52PM +0800, bill lam wrote: > > On Mon, 25 May 2009, Wu, Yue wrote: > > > On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 09:51:59AM +0800, bill lam wrote: > > > > On Sun, 24 May 2009, Wu, Yue wrote: > > > > > Hi, I tried to make all of R[www.r-project.or

Re: [dev] How to make R's windows floating?

On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 03:08:13PM +0800, Wu, Yue wrote: > Why my output doesn't contain the WM_CLASS field? And I think 'R*' can match > the WM_NAME too, but it doesn't actually. AFAIK dwm uses just strstr for matching, so no wildcards are allowed. pgpjjKeL8rUJF.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [dev] How to make R's windows floating?

On 5/25/09, Wu, Yue wrote: > I run xprop, it produces: >> xprop WM_CLASS > WM_CLASS: not found. > > Why my output doesn't contain the WM_CLASS field? And I think 'R*' can match > the WM_NAME too, but it doesn't actually. http://www.suckless.org/dwm/customisation/rules.html

Re: [dev] How to make R's windows floating?

On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 02:47:52PM +0800, bill lam wrote: > On Mon, 25 May 2009, Wu, Yue wrote: > > On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 09:51:59AM +0800, bill lam wrote: > > > On Sun, 24 May 2009, Wu, Yue wrote: > > > > Hi, I tried to make all of R[www.r-project.org] relative stuffs, like > > > > graph it > >