On Mon, 25 May 2009 01:41:10 +0400 Michael <mi...@netspark.org> wrote:
> sta...@cs.tu-berlin.de wrote: > > * Michael <mi...@netspark.org> [2009-05-24 21:55]: > > > Although concept of one page per instance isn't very useful for > > > me right now. I use dwm, and I want web page be full screen, but > > > if I'm not in monocle mode, pages get shrunk in a half if there > > > is more than one page, which is bad, and monocle mode isn't > > > useful because I want my terminal windows be tiled. > > > > With tabs you can view only one rendered document at a time. If you > > have multiple instances (e.g. with uzbl), you can send the inactive > > ones to some other (dedicated or whatever) tag. > > > > Then, to get some inactive to active is pretty much the same amount > > of keystrokes like you would need with tabs, isn't it? > > > > Well, suppose I have 5 page in 'oldweb' tag and 1 page in 'web' tag, > to bring up page which I want, I need: > * switch to oldweb > * _visually_ found page > * tag it to web > * switch to web again > * tag unneeded page to oldweb > > Maybe I miss simple way of uzbl handling, but that's what I came up. > It's painful. Although I happy with tagging concept and use it > successfully for terminals and other things, but web don't work well > with me in such way. > > If uzbl could handle Vim-like buffers it could be a little bit > shorter: > * :ls > * find page by URL > * :<number> (for example) > > Third way is to make first way automatic: make a collection of windows > for certain tags, select one through dmenu, oldweb-tag current, and > web-tag selected. But dwm have to be told somehow to send list of > oldweb-tagged windows, to tag and untag certain windows. (And I really > don't want to throw away dwm, although I think wmii has such > functionality). > http://github.com/Dieterbe/uzbl/blob/experimental/docs/multiple-instances-management Dieter
