On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 10:26 AM, Mark Phippard wrote:
> I thought we did not have a deps package with the 1.7.x releases?
Nevermind then. :D
On 09/27/2012 01:24 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
>> If it compiles, links, and loads, then you should be just fine. I don't
>> believe there are semantic changes within any given entrypoint.
>
> Are there any objections to shipping serf-1.1.0 with our
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 1:24 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
>> If it compiles, links, and loads, then you should be just fine. I don't
>> believe there are semantic changes within any given entrypoint.
>
> Are there any objections to shipping serf-1.1.0
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> If it compiles, links, and loads, then you should be just fine. I don't
> believe there are semantic changes within any given entrypoint.
Are there any objections to shipping serf-1.1.0 with our deps package
going forward? Based on what Greg s
On Sep 21, 2012 5:12 AM, "Branko Čibej" wrote:
>
> On 21.09.2012 10:29, Ben Reser wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 12:59 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> >> The serf API wasn't stable in 0.x releases.
> >> ra_serf in svn 1.5/1.6 doesn't support newer serf APIs AFAIK.
> > According to Paul Burba he
On 21.09.2012 10:29, Ben Reser wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 12:59 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>> The serf API wasn't stable in 0.x releases.
>> ra_serf in svn 1.5/1.6 doesn't support newer serf APIs AFAIK.
> According to Paul Burba he tested with serf 1.1.0 and Johan Corveleyn
> tested with 0.7
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Ben Reser wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 12:59 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>> The serf API wasn't stable in 0.x releases.
>> ra_serf in svn 1.5/1.6 doesn't support newer serf APIs AFAIK.
>
> According to Paul Burba he tested with serf 1.1.0 and Johan Corveleyn
>
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 12:59 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> The serf API wasn't stable in 0.x releases.
> ra_serf in svn 1.5/1.6 doesn't support newer serf APIs AFAIK.
According to Paul Burba he tested with serf 1.1.0 and Johan Corveleyn
tested with 0.7.1. I successfully used 0.7.2 on OS X and Li
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 06:52:47PM -0700, Ben Reser wrote:
> We currently have serf 0.3.1 in this file. However, this version
> fails to build on Windows due to this problem:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/subversion-dev/201007.mbox/%3caanlktimjwqifcmss3b6s2gwvrkyglct2-bd6b-jiz...@mail
We currently have serf 0.3.1 in this file. However, this version
fails to build on Windows due to this problem:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/subversion-dev/201007.mbox/%3caanlktimjwqifcmss3b6s2gwvrkyglct2-bd6b-jiz...@mail.gmail.com%3E
Is there a particular reason we're still shipping
10 matches
Mail list logo