On 09/27/2012 01:24 PM, Ben Reser wrote: > On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote: >> If it compiles, links, and loads, then you should be just fine. I don't >> believe there are semantic changes within any given entrypoint. > > Are there any objections to shipping serf-1.1.0 with our deps package > going forward? Based on what Greg said I don't think there's any > technical reason not to. If not I'll be doing so with 1.7.7. > > If we do another 1.6 release we probably should use 0.7, since 1.6's > serf.m4 doesn't know about major 1 of serf.
IIRC, we don't do 'deps' for 1.7 and beyond. -- C. Michael Pilato <cmpil...@collab.net> CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Enterprise Cloud Development
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
