Re: Windows build complaining about missing 'ruby'

On 2024/10/07 18:38, Johan Corveleyn wrote: > On Sun, Oct 6, 2024 at 10:17 PM Johan Corveleyn wrote: >> >> On Sat, Oct 5, 2024 at 8:20 AM Jun Omae wrote: >> ... Yes, that looks good to me. The warning is gone :-). >> Thanks again! >> >> -- >> Johan > > BTW: feel free to commit of course (th

Re: Windows build complaining about missing 'ruby'

On Sun, Oct 6, 2024 at 10:17 PM Johan Corveleyn wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 5, 2024 at 8:20 AM Jun Omae wrote: > > > > On 2024/10/04 3:57, Johan Corveleyn wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Another small bump when building on Windows: when gen-make.py runs, or > > > when starting to run tests, I always get

Re: Windows build complaining about missing 'ruby'

On Sat, Oct 5, 2024 at 8:20 AM Jun Omae wrote: > > On 2024/10/04 3:57, Johan Corveleyn wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Another small bump when building on Windows: when gen-make.py runs, or > > when starting to run tests, I always get the following printed on the > > console: > > > > [[[ > > 'ruby' is not

Re: Windows build: gen_make.py trips over zlib 1.3

On Sat, Oct 5, 2024 at 7:51 AM Jun Omae wrote: > > On 2024/10/04 3:54, Johan Corveleyn wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I ran into a small issue when building trunk on Windows with zlib 1.3. > > Not a big deal, I could work around it. But I don't have time right > > now to come up with a proper patch, so I

Re: Windows build complaining about missing 'ruby'

On 2024/10/04 3:57, Johan Corveleyn wrote: > Hi, > > Another small bump when building on Windows: when gen-make.py runs, or > when starting to run tests, I always get the following printed on the > console: > > [[[ > 'ruby' is not recognized as an internal or external command, > operable program

Re: Windows build: gen_make.py trips over zlib 1.3

On 2024/10/04 3:54, Johan Corveleyn wrote: > Hi, > > I ran into a small issue when building trunk on Windows with zlib 1.3. > Not a big deal, I could work around it. But I don't have time right > now to come up with a proper patch, so I thought I'd just mention it > here already. > > When trying

RE: Windows build

-Original Message- From: Nathan Hartman Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2022 4:21 PM To: Daniel Sahlberg Cc: Subversion Development Subject: Re: Windows build On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 11:10 AM Daniel Sahlberg wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm once again restarting my efforts o

Re: Windows build

: https://github.com/Jan-E/svn-windows From: Nathan Hartman Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2022 09:21 To: Daniel Sahlberg Cc: Subversion Development Subject: Re: Windows build On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 11:10 AM Daniel Sahlberg wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm once

Re: Windows build

Daniel Sahlberg wrote on Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 16:09:51 +0100: > Hi, > > I'm once again restarting my efforts on a solid Windows build environment. > I've been checking the scripts in build/win32 and believe these might be a > reasonable starting point. > > Does anyone have recent (or not so recen

Re: Windows build

On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 11:10 AM Daniel Sahlberg wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm once again restarting my efforts on a solid Windows build environment. > I've been checking the scripts in build/win32 and believe these might be a > reasonable starting point. > > Does anyone have recent (or not so recent..

Re: Windows Build

On Sat, Feb 27, 2021 at 8:31 AM Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Alan Fry wrote on Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 11:19:27 -0500: > > "Visual Studio". I'm brand new to open source development. And since > I've > > lived in a MS world at work, I made the automatic "Windows = Visual > > Studio". I'd like to ask up-

Re: Windows Build

Alan Fry wrote on Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 11:19:27 -0500: > "Visual Studio". I'm brand new to open source development. And since I've > lived in a MS world at work, I made the automatic "Windows = Visual > Studio". I'd like to ask up-front for any advice. Is the expectation for > build(s) to be ve

Re: Windows Build

On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 5:41 PM Daniel Sahlberg wrote: > Den ons 24 feb. 2021 kl 15:14 skrev Alan Fry : > >> This is great information, thank you Daniel. >> >> I'm traveling for work right now and will be back on the 8th of March. >> Then I can dig into the details of a windows build. I'll menti

Re: Windows Build

Thanks Adam, I am actually going to start with this particular script (yes, you had shared it before). This might be a good time to ask some Windows Specific build questions: "Visual Studio". I'm brand new to open source development. And since I've lived in a MS world at work, I made the autom

Re: Windows Build

Den ons 24 feb. 2021 kl 15:14 skrev Alan Fry : > This is great information, thank you Daniel. > > I'm traveling for work right now and will be back on the 8th of March. > Then I can dig into the details of a windows build. I'll mention again > that I'm a windows developer, so this should be signi

Re: Windows Build

I'm pretty sure I've shared this previously, but wanted to bring it up again - https://gist.github.com/ahwm/47dca1ae4290094a539d5dcc30338fb9 This mimics my build environment. I've not tried TortoiseSVN's builds so I'm not sure how they compare. The binaries shipped with TSVN don't have the modules

Re: Windows Build

This is great information, thank you Daniel. I'm traveling for work right now and will be back on the 8th of March. Then I can dig into the details of a windows build. I'll mention again that I'm a windows developer, so this should be significantly faster, and require less help :). You had menti

Re: Windows Build

Agreed, as soon as I saw the embedded year, I thought "why" to myself. The goal is to get something in Windows to work next, then circle back and begin to look at how to document the creation of a build environment. At this point, as long as we get a repeatable documented process we should be goo

Re: Windows Build

Alan Fry wrote on Fri, 19 Feb 2021 16:13 +00:00: > Setup SQLLite: > > # cd ~/src > # wget https://www.sqlite.org/2021/sqlite-amalgamation-3340100.zip > > unzip the zip file. > Rename the unzipped directory to "sqlite-amalgamation" > and move it to subversion-1.14.1 It should have been possible t

Re: Windows Build

Try #2, this time with entire set of instructions: - To generate a virtual machine that builds SVN Download iso: ubuntu-20.04.2-desktop-amd64.iso Create a new virtual machine in Virtualbox Name: SVN Build OS: Linux / Ubuntu 64bit 4096MB of ram virtual hard disk VDI (Virtualbox

Re: Windows Build

Daniel Sahlberg in gmane.comp.version-control.subversion.devel (Thu, 18 Feb 2021 00:25:06 +0100): >In addition to this excellent thread it might be interesting to take a >look at TortoiseSVN's build process [1]. > >As far as I understand it, all dependencies are build from source. >Dependencies sit

Re: Windows Build

Hi Alan, This reads for me just like setting up Ubuntu 20.04 in Virtualbox, but is not related to Subversion. Did you miss some Subversion-relevant steps at the end? BR Tom On 2021-02-18 19:47, Alan Fry wrote: On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 11:31 AM Nathan Hartman wrote: On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 a

Re: Windows Build

On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 11:31 AM Nathan Hartman wrote: > On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 11:12 AM Alan Fry wrote: > > For all that helped w/ the Linux build, thank you, I have a set of > > repeatable build instructions for Subversion on linux. If there is > > value, I'd be happy to post those. I verif

Re: Windows Build

Den ons 17 feb. 2021 kl 17:31 skrev Nathan Hartman : > > On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 11:12 AM Alan Fry wrote: > > For all that helped w/ the Linux build, thank you, I have a set of > > repeatable build instructions for Subversion on linux. If there is > > value, I'd be happy to post those. I verifie

Re: Windows Build

On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 11:12 AM Alan Fry wrote: > For all that helped w/ the Linux build, thank you, I have a set of > repeatable build instructions for Subversion on linux. If there is > value, I'd be happy to post those. I verified those instructions > last night, building from ground up a VM

Re: Windows build error introduced in revision 1850611

Hi, I happened to find this issue myself today, short before your message was moderated through. I applied a fix to build.conf in r1851462, which should fix the problem. (It is currently being tested by our buildbot). Thanks, Bert On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 5:04 PM Alexander Miloslavskiy < ale

Re: Windows build still requires apr-util?

On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 8:09 AM, Bert Huijben wrote: > In the current state we haven't started adding 2.X compatibility, as > officially it doesn't exist yet. (Anything can change until the first > released 2.X. There are no compatibly promises between major versions) Unix build works with APR

Re: Windows build still requires apr-util?

On 14 March 2013 16:09, Bert Huijben wrote: > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Sergei Antonov [mailto:sap...@gmail.com] >> Sent: donderdag 14 maart 2013 16:02 >> To: dev@subversion.apache.org >> Subject: Re: Windows build still requires apr-util? >&g

RE: Windows build still requires apr-util?

> -Original Message- > From: Sergei Antonov [mailto:sap...@gmail.com] > Sent: donderdag 14 maart 2013 16:02 > To: dev@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Re: Windows build still requires apr-util? > > On 14 March 2013 15:00, Bert Huijben wrote: > > >

Re: Windows build still requires apr-util?

On 14 March 2013 15:00, Bert Huijben wrote: > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Sergei Antonov [mailto:sap...@gmail.com] >> Sent: donderdag 14 maart 2013 14:13 >> To: Bert Huijben >> Subject: Re: Windows build still requires apr-util? >> >

RE: Windows build still requires apr-util?

> -Original Message- > From: Sergei Antonov [mailto:sap...@gmail.com] > Sent: donderdag 14 maart 2013 14:13 > To: Bert Huijben > Subject: Re: Windows build still requires apr-util? > > On 14 March 2013 13:44, Bert Huijben wrote: > > > > > >> --

RE: Windows build still requires apr-util?

> -Original Message- > From: Sergei Antonov [mailto:sap...@gmail.com] > Sent: donderdag 14 maart 2013 13:33 > To: dev@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Re: Windows build still requires apr-util? > > On 13 March 2013 19:15, Bert Huijben wrote: > > >

Re: Windows build still requires apr-util?

On 13 March 2013 19:15, Bert Huijben wrote: > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Sergei Antonov [mailto:sap...@gmail.com] >> Sent: woensdag 13 maart 2013 18:47 >> To: dev@subversion.apache.org >> Subject: Re: Windows build still requires apr-util? &g

Re: Windows build still requires apr-util?

Hi, On 13 March 2013 18:51, wrote: > Doesn't Apache officially only support vc6 builds for httpd on Windows? The ASF supports no binaries at all. Indeed Bill used to compile httpd with VC6, but the plans are to go to newer compiler. You may have noticed that there weren't any windows binaries

Re: Windows build still requires apr-util?

I've been using VC6 to test the ruby bindings as I haven't yet succeeded in building with mingw. It needs this patch: [[[ Index: build/generator/gen_win.py === --- build/generator/gen_win.py (revision 1454760) +++ build/generator/ge

RE: Windows build still requires apr-util?

> -Original Message- > From: Sergei Antonov [mailto:sap...@gmail.com] > Sent: woensdag 13 maart 2013 18:47 > To: dev@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Re: Windows build still requires apr-util? > > Gentle reminder: VS 2010 doesn't compile the latest revisio

Re: Windows build still requires apr-util?

On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 1:51 PM, wrote: > > > Nor should you even try to, IMO. There comes a time when it ceases to > > > make any sense to support an old compiler that's been EOL-d a while > ago, > > > especially since free versions of newer compilers are available. > > > > > > I would support r

Re: Windows build still requires apr-util?

> > Nor should you even try to, IMO. There comes a time when it ceases to > > make any sense to support an old compiler that's been EOL-d a while ago, > > especially since free versions of newer compilers are available. > > > > I would support removing the .dsp generator completely. > > +1, it's

Re: Windows build still requires apr-util?

Gentle reminder: VS 2010 doesn't compile the latest revision. Please, add "#include " into subversion\libsvn_subr\win32_crashrpt.c and commit.

RE: Windows build still requires apr-util?

> -Original Message- > From: Ben Reser [mailto:b...@reser.org] > Sent: woensdag 13 maart 2013 18:14 > To: Branko Čibej > Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Re: Windows build still requires apr-util? > > On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 6:59 AM, Branko Čibej >

Re: Windows build still requires apr-util?

On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 6:59 AM, Branko Čibej wrote: > Nor should you even try to, IMO. There comes a time when it ceases to > make any sense to support an old compiler that's been EOL-d a while ago, > especially since free versions of newer compilers are available. > > I would support removing th

Re: Windows build still requires apr-util?

On 13.03.2013 13:08, Bert Huijben wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Sergei Antonov [mailto:sap...@gmail.com] >> Sent: zondag 10 maart 2013 16:39 >> To: dev@subversion.apache.org >> Subject: Re: Windows build still requires apr-util? >> >> Wel

RE: Windows build still requires apr-util?

> -Original Message- > From: Sergei Antonov [mailto:sap...@gmail.com] > Sent: zondag 10 maart 2013 16:39 > To: dev@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Re: Windows build still requires apr-util? > > Well, I took apr-util-1.5.1-win32-src.zip and dsw/dsp were generated. &g

Re: Windows build still requires apr-util?

>> Well, I took apr-util-1.5.1-win32-src.zip and dsw/dsp were generated. >> Then I opened .dsw in VS 2010, did a conversion, and tried to build. >> Nothing except zlib compiles, with a lot of "Cannot open include file: >> 'svn_private_config.h'" errors. Did I miss some step that generates >> this f

RE: Windows build still requires apr-util?

> -Original Message- > From: Sergei Antonov [mailto:sap...@gmail.com] > Sent: zondag 10 maart 2013 16:39 > To: dev@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Re: Windows build still requires apr-util? > > Well, I took apr-util-1.5.1-win32-src.zip and dsw/dsp were generated.

Re: Windows build still requires apr-util?

Well, I took apr-util-1.5.1-win32-src.zip and dsw/dsp were generated. Then I opened .dsw in VS 2010, did a conversion, and tried to build. Nothing except zlib compiles, with a lot of "Cannot open include file: 'svn_private_config.h'" errors. Did I miss some step that generates this file? On 10 Mar

RE: Windows build still requires apr-util?

Yes, you need apr-util for apr 0.x and 1.x. In 2.x apr-util might/will be integrated in Apr,so you still need it but don't have to install it separately. In the past you also needed apr-iconv, but that is no longer required (depending on your settings) Bert From: Sergei Antonov Sent: 10-3-2013 1

RE: Windows build, nonexistent functions

> -Original Message- > From: Stefan Küng [mailto:tortoise...@gmail.com] > Sent: zondag 29 mei 2011 14:41 > To: Bert Huijben > Cc: 'Greg Stein'; 'Subversion Development'; 'Daniel Shahaf' > Subject: Re: Windows build, nonexistent functi

Re: Windows build, nonexistent functions

On 29.05.2011 14:25, Bert Huijben wrote: I've adjusted the TSVN build to remove those functions from the extractor.py output. So it's not a big deal for me. But I'm still wondering whether the Windows build for the svn client works. Can anyone here try it? If it works, those functions could stay

RE: Windows build, nonexistent functions

> -Original Message- > From: Stefan Küng [mailto:tortoise...@gmail.com] > Sent: zondag 29 mei 2011 10:03 > To: Greg Stein > Cc: Subversion Development; Daniel Shahaf > Subject: Re: Windows build, nonexistent functions > > On 29.05.2011 09:54, Greg Stein wrote: &

Re: Windows build, nonexistent functions

Stefan Küng wrote on Sun, May 29, 2011 at 10:03:01 +0200: > But I'm still wondering whether the Windows build for the svn client > works. Can anyone here try it? The build works every day for N windows-based devs and 2 windows buildbots. If you're going to ask "Does the Windows build work", I sug

Re: Windows build, nonexistent functions

On 29.05.2011 09:54, Greg Stein wrote: On May 29, 2011 2:55 AM, "Stefan Küng" mailto:tortoise...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > On 29.05.2011 04:31, Greg Stein wrote: >> On May 28, 2011 1:39 PM, "Stefan Küng" mailto:tortoise...@gmail.com> >>

Re: Windows build, nonexistent functions

On May 29, 2011 2:55 AM, "Stefan Küng" wrote: > > On 29.05.2011 04:31, Greg Stein wrote: >> On May 28, 2011 1:39 PM, "Stefan Küng" > > wrote: >... >> > >> > I did a grep search for those functions, and the only files they >> showed up were the headers, no other file

Re: Windows build, nonexistent functions

On 29.05.2011 04:31, Greg Stein wrote: On May 28, 2011 1:39 PM, "Stefan Küng" mailto:tortoise...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > On 28.05.2011 19:33, Daniel Shahaf wrote: >> >> Fair enough. >> >> However, we don't have a practice of keeping declarations without >> corresponding definitions. If th

Re: Windows build, nonexistent functions

On May 28, 2011 1:39 PM, "Stefan Küng" wrote: > > On 28.05.2011 19:33, Daniel Shahaf wrote: >> >> Fair enough. >> >> However, we don't have a practice of keeping declarations without >> corresponding definitions. If that is indeed the case (as opposed to >> definitions which are conditional on pr

Re: Windows build, nonexistent functions

On 28.05.2011 19:33, Daniel Shahaf wrote: Stefan Küng wrote on Sat, May 28, 2011 at 19:05:34 +0200: On 28.05.2011 19:03, Daniel Shahaf wrote: Stefan Küng wrote on Sat, May 28, 2011 at 15:43:58 +0200: I think having such functions mentioned in the header but not implemented is not good. Why a

Re: Windows build, nonexistent functions

Stefan Küng wrote on Sat, May 28, 2011 at 19:05:34 +0200: > On 28.05.2011 19:03, Daniel Shahaf wrote: >> Stefan Küng wrote on Sat, May 28, 2011 at 15:43:58 +0200: >>> I think having such functions mentioned in the header but not >>> implemented is not good. >> >> Why are you telling us that? You h

Re: Windows build, nonexistent functions

On 28.05.2011 19:03, Daniel Shahaf wrote: Stefan Küng wrote on Sat, May 28, 2011 at 15:43:58 +0200: I think having such functions mentioned in the header but not implemented is not good. Why are you telling us that? You have commit access. I don't want to break something. Maybe those will g

Re: Windows build, nonexistent functions

Stefan Küng wrote on Sat, May 28, 2011 at 15:43:58 +0200: > I think having such functions mentioned in the header but not > implemented is not good. Why are you telling us that? You have commit access.