Re: Merging /branches/integrate-cache-membuffer to /trunk

2011-02-06 Thread Mark Phippard
On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 3:22 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote: > Merge is done and everything got adapted > to support both server types equally. The new > caching code is active by default. > > BTW, how / where do we document things like > the new mod_dav_svn module parameter? I was going to ask if you

Re: Merging /branches/integrate-cache-membuffer to /trunk

2011-02-06 Thread Stefan Fuhrmann
On 28.01.2011 05:27, Hyrum K Wright wrote: On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 4:42 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote: On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 11:25:59PM +0100, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote: Hi @all, I'm planning to merge said branch Monday 7th. Speak now or forever hold your peace. Rationale: I've been testing / usi

Re: Merging /branches/integrate-cache-membuffer to /trunk

2011-01-28 Thread Branko Čibej
On 28.01.2011 05:56, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > We could ask ASF infra to enable the "optional" feature on svn.eu > (without enabling it on svn.us). > > The experimental code gets tested, and if it cooks the disk alive and > burns the data then we (pay for a new disk and) svnsync svn.us to svn.eu :-)

Re: Merging /branches/integrate-cache-membuffer to /trunk

2011-01-27 Thread Daniel Shahaf
We could ask ASF infra to enable the "optional" feature on svn.eu (without enabling it on svn.us). The experimental code gets tested, and if it cooks the disk alive and burns the data then we (pay for a new disk and) svnsync svn.us to svn.eu :-) Stefan Sperling wrote on Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 23:42

Re: Merging /branches/integrate-cache-membuffer to /trunk

2011-01-27 Thread Hyrum K Wright
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 4:42 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 11:25:59PM +0100, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote: >> Hi @all, >> >> I'm planning to merge said branch Monday 7th. >> Speak now or forever hold your peace. >> >> Rationale: >> >> I've been testing / using that code for a while

Re: Merging /branches/integrate-cache-membuffer to /trunk

2011-01-27 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 11:58 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote: > On 27.01.2011 01:56, Johan Corveleyn wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 11:42 PM, Stefan Sperling  wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 11:25:59PM +0100, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote: Hi @all, I'm planning to merge said br

Re: Merging /branches/integrate-cache-membuffer to /trunk

2011-01-27 Thread Stefan Fuhrmann
On 27.01.2011 01:56, Johan Corveleyn wrote: On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 11:42 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote: On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 11:25:59PM +0100, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote: Hi @all, I'm planning to merge said branch Monday 7th. Speak now or forever hold your peace. Rationale: I've been testing / u

Re: Merging /branches/integrate-cache-membuffer to /trunk

2011-01-26 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 11:42 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 11:25:59PM +0100, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote: >> Hi @all, >> >> I'm planning to merge said branch Monday 7th. >> Speak now or forever hold your peace. >> >> Rationale: >> >> I've been testing / using that code for a whil

Re: Merging /branches/integrate-cache-membuffer to /trunk

2011-01-26 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 11:25:59PM +0100, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote: > Hi @all, > > I'm planning to merge said branch Monday 7th. > Speak now or forever hold your peace. > > Rationale: > > I've been testing / using that code for a while now > and am reasonably confident that it works. And it > is no

Merging /branches/integrate-cache-membuffer to /trunk

2011-01-26 Thread Stefan Fuhrmann
Hi @all, I'm planning to merge said branch Monday 7th. Speak now or forever hold your peace. Rationale: I've been testing / using that code for a while now and am reasonably confident that it works. And it is not exactly rocket science, either. Because a large portion of my other performance w