On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 11:25:59PM +0100, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote: > Hi @all, > > I'm planning to merge said branch Monday 7th. > Speak now or forever hold your peace. > > Rationale: > > I've been testing / using that code for a while now > and am reasonably confident that it works. And it > is not exactly rocket science, either. > > Because a large portion of my other performance > work builds upon that low-latency caching feature, > it would really like to see it being merged. Directly > after the merge, I will make the feature strictly opt-in > instead of defaulting to a 16 or 64 MB cache.
I'd say merging to trunk is perfectly fine if you're confident that there aren't any roadblock issues and it's not enabled by default anyway. We've released optional new features in the past (e.g. libsvn_serf). It's much more likely to get tested this way :) Stefan
