Hi @all, I'm planning to merge said branch Monday 7th. Speak now or forever hold your peace.
Rationale: I've been testing / using that code for a while now and am reasonably confident that it works. And it is not exactly rocket science, either. Because a large portion of my other performance work builds upon that low-latency caching feature, it would really like to see it being merged. Directly after the merge, I will make the feature strictly opt-in instead of defaulting to a 16 or 64 MB cache. Since I'm away from home next week, I won't be able to do the merge before Monday, 7th. -- Stefan^2.
