Ben Reser wrote:
> On 1/26/15 11:24 AM, Julian Foad wrote:
>> I think it's useful to have builders at both ends of the spectrum:
> minimal/oldest, and also bleeding-edge/all-fancy-options.
>>
>> Any reason we shouldn't request two VMs and maintain both? I can't
> see it being an unacceptable
On 1/26/15 11:24 AM, Julian Foad wrote:
> I think it's useful to have builders at both ends of the spectrum:
> minimal/oldest, and also bleeding-edge/all-fancy-options.
>
> Any reason we shouldn't request two VMs and maintain both? I can't see it
> being an unacceptable computing load nor admini
--
Join WANdisco's free daily demo sessions on Scaling Subversion for the
Enterprise
<http://www.wandisco.com/training/webinars>
- Original Message -
> From: Ben Reser
> To: Subversion Development
> Cc:
> Sent: Monday, 26 January 2015, 18:59
> Subject:
Seems that the machine that was running our CentOS buildbot has disappeared.
We can get a new one setup (probably a VM, not sure if the old one was physical
hardware or a VM).
But the question is now what do we want. The CentOS buildbot was running a
rather old version of CentOS, we actually had
4 matches
Mail list logo
