Ben Reser wrote: > On 1/26/15 11:24 AM, Julian Foad wrote: >> I think it's useful to have builders at both ends of the spectrum: > minimal/oldest, and also bleeding-edge/all-fancy-options. >> >> Any reason we shouldn't request two VMs and maintain both? I can't > see it being an unacceptable computing load nor administrative burden. > > If that's what we want to ask for that's fine with me. The only issue > is that > a bleeding-edge setup is going to take more effort to maintain.
Ah yes, I hadn't thought of the question "bleeding-edge WHEN?" i.e. how often we'd want to update it. - Julian
