On 1/26/15 11:24 AM, Julian Foad wrote: > I think it's useful to have builders at both ends of the spectrum: > minimal/oldest, and also bleeding-edge/all-fancy-options. > > Any reason we shouldn't request two VMs and maintain both? I can't see it > being an unacceptable computing load nor administrative burden.
If that's what we want to ask for that's fine with me. The only issue is that a bleeding-edge setup is going to take more effort to maintain.
