Re: [VOTE] Adjust voting required for alpha/beta releases.

2014-04-10 Thread Ben Reser
On 4/7/14, 8:58 AM, Ben Reser wrote: > Let's adopt Johan's suggestion from the other thread. > > Specifically, for alpha/beta releases (no change for release candidates or > normal releases). Require at least 1 vote for each platform (Windows/Unix) > and > at least 3 votes total. > > For exampl

Re: [VOTE] Adjust voting required for alpha/beta releases.

2014-04-08 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 4:58 PM, Ben Reser wrote: > Let's adopt Johan's suggestion from the other thread. > > Specifically, for alpha/beta releases (no change for release candidates or > normal releases). Require at least 1 vote for each platform (Windows/Unix) > and > at least 3 votes total. > >

Re: [VOTE] Adjust voting required for alpha/beta releases.

2014-04-08 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Ben Reser wrote on Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 14:57:44 -0600: > On 4/7/14, 2:08 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > > To be pedantic, your last phrase could be mis-interpreted - I'm pretty > > sure that you mean that someone can indeed test with multiple > > platforms; not that "each person only has one vote"

Re: [VOTE] Adjust voting required for alpha/beta releases.

2014-04-07 Thread Ben Reser
On 4/7/14, 2:08 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > To be pedantic, your last phrase could be mis-interpreted - I'm pretty > sure that you mean that someone can indeed test with multiple > platforms; not that "each person only has one vote". Yes that's what I mean. You can't vote twice for Windows. B

Re: [VOTE] Adjust voting required for alpha/beta releases.

2014-04-07 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 12:03 PM, Ben Reser wrote: > So to summarize. 3 votes must come from separate individuals. Our platform > testing requirements do not have to be met by separate people (though each > person obviously can only have one vote for each platform). +1. To be pedantic, your las

Re: [VOTE] Adjust voting required for alpha/beta releases.

2014-04-07 Thread Ben Reser
On 4/7/14, 1:29 PM, Branko Čibej wrote: > On 07.04.2014 13:20, Daniel Shahaf wrote: >> Ben Reser wrote on Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 08:58:52 -0600: >>> for alpha/beta releases (no change for release candidates or normal >>> releases). Require at least 1 vote for each platform (Windows/Unix) >>> and at

Re: [VOTE] Adjust voting required for alpha/beta releases.

2014-04-07 Thread Branko Čibej
On 07.04.2014 13:20, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Ben Reser wrote on Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 08:58:52 -0600: >> for alpha/beta releases (no change for release candidates or normal >> releases). Require at least 1 vote for each platform (Windows/Unix) >> and at least 3 votes total. > Does this apply to 1.9.

Re: [VOTE] Adjust voting required for alpha/beta releases.

2014-04-07 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Ben Reser wrote on Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 08:58:52 -0600: > for alpha/beta releases (no change for release candidates or normal > releases). Require at least 1 vote for each platform (Windows/Unix) > and at least 3 votes total. Does this apply to 1.9.0-alpha2?

Re: [VOTE] Adjust voting required for alpha/beta releases.

2014-04-07 Thread Julian Foad
Ben Reser wrote: > Let's adopt Johan's suggestion from the other thread. > > Specifically, for alpha/beta releases (no change for release candidates or > normal releases).  Require at least 1 vote for each platform (Windows/Unix) > and > at least 3 votes total. > > For example. > > If the votin

Re: [VOTE] Adjust voting required for alpha/beta releases.

2014-04-07 Thread Julian Foad
Branko Čibej wrote: > Please note: strictly speaking, it is not really a change in policy, > because we haven't really been producing alpha and beta releases > until now. An alpha or beta release is still considered an Apache > release, and therefore falls under the 3+1/no-1 rule. It's not no -1's

Re: [VOTE] Adjust voting required for alpha/beta releases.

2014-04-07 Thread Lieven Govaerts
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 4:58 PM, Ben Reser wrote: > Let's adopt Johan's suggestion from the other thread. > > Specifically, for alpha/beta releases (no change for release candidates or > normal releases). Require at least 1 vote for each platform (Windows/Unix) > and > at least 3 votes total. > >

Re: [VOTE] Adjust voting required for alpha/beta releases.

2014-04-07 Thread Branko Čibej
On 07.04.2014 08:58, Ben Reser wrote: > Let's adopt Johan's suggestion from the other thread. > > Specifically, for alpha/beta releases (no change for release candidates or > normal releases). Require at least 1 vote for each platform (Windows/Unix) > and > at least 3 votes total. > > For example

Re: [VOTE] Adjust voting required for alpha/beta releases.

2014-04-07 Thread Stefan Fuhrmann
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 5:17 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote: > On 04/07/2014 11:10 AM, Branko Čibej wrote: > > On 07.04.2014 09:06, C. Michael Pilato wrote: > >> On 04/07/2014 10:58 AM, Ben Reser wrote: > >>> Let's adopt Johan's suggestion from the other thread. > >>> > >>> Specifically, for alpha/bet

Re: [VOTE] Adjust voting required for alpha/beta releases.

2014-04-07 Thread Ben Reser
On 4/7/14, 9:10 AM, Branko Čibej wrote: > On 07.04.2014 09:06, C. Michael Pilato wrote: >> On 04/07/2014 10:58 AM, Ben Reser wrote: >>> Let's adopt Johan's suggestion from the other thread. >>> >>> Specifically, for alpha/beta releases (no change for release candidates or >>> normal releases). Req

Re: [VOTE] Adjust voting required for alpha/beta releases.

2014-04-07 Thread Branko Čibej
On 07.04.2014 09:30, Ivan Zhakov wrote: > On 7 April 2014 18:58, Ben Reser wrote: >> Let's adopt Johan's suggestion from the other thread. >> >> Specifically, for alpha/beta releases (no change for release candidates or >> normal releases). Require at least 1 vote for each platform (Windows/Unix)

Re: [VOTE] Adjust voting required for alpha/beta releases.

2014-04-07 Thread Ivan Zhakov
On 7 April 2014 18:58, Ben Reser wrote: > Let's adopt Johan's suggestion from the other thread. > > Specifically, for alpha/beta releases (no change for release candidates or > normal releases). Require at least 1 vote for each platform (Windows/Unix) > and > at least 3 votes total. > > For exam

Re: [VOTE] Adjust voting required for alpha/beta releases.

2014-04-07 Thread Mark Phippard
+1 On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 10:58 AM, Ben Reser wrote: > Let's adopt Johan's suggestion from the other thread. > > Specifically, for alpha/beta releases (no change for release candidates or > normal releases). Require at least 1 vote for each platform > (Windows/Unix) and > at least 3 votes tota

Re: [VOTE] Adjust voting required for alpha/beta releases.

2014-04-07 Thread C. Michael Pilato
On 04/07/2014 11:10 AM, Branko Čibej wrote: > On 07.04.2014 09:06, C. Michael Pilato wrote: >> On 04/07/2014 10:58 AM, Ben Reser wrote: >>> Let's adopt Johan's suggestion from the other thread. >>> >>> Specifically, for alpha/beta releases (no change for release candidates or >>> normal releases).

Re: [VOTE] Adjust voting required for alpha/beta releases.

2014-04-07 Thread Branko Čibej
On 07.04.2014 09:06, C. Michael Pilato wrote: > On 04/07/2014 10:58 AM, Ben Reser wrote: >> Let's adopt Johan's suggestion from the other thread. >> >> Specifically, for alpha/beta releases (no change for release candidates or >> normal releases). Require at least 1 vote for each platform (Windows

Re: [VOTE] Adjust voting required for alpha/beta releases.

2014-04-07 Thread C. Michael Pilato
On 04/07/2014 10:58 AM, Ben Reser wrote: > Let's adopt Johan's suggestion from the other thread. > > Specifically, for alpha/beta releases (no change for release candidates or > normal releases). Require at least 1 vote for each platform (Windows/Unix) > and > at least 3 votes total. Quick clar

[VOTE] Adjust voting required for alpha/beta releases.

2014-04-07 Thread Ben Reser
Let's adopt Johan's suggestion from the other thread. Specifically, for alpha/beta releases (no change for release candidates or normal releases). Require at least 1 vote for each platform (Windows/Unix) and at least 3 votes total. For example. If the voting was like this: +3 Unix Then we'd st