On 4/7/14, 2:08 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > To be pedantic, your last phrase could be mis-interpreted - I'm pretty > sure that you mean that someone can indeed test with multiple > platforms; not that "each person only has one vote".
Yes that's what I mean. You can't vote twice for Windows. But you could vote for Windows and Unix. > Perhaps this would be easier if we just codified this into a script? > didthevotepass.com. That's difficult because there's no standard way people vote. I've often wished we had something like that. I often use the release.py check-sigs as a check, but you can't use the signature count for anything useful. For one thing the signature doesn't tell us what platform was tested (people often sign the zip files when they only voted for unix). Another problem is you may have multiple signatures from the same person on the same file (either as a mistake as has happened in the past or due to signing with multiple keys). So I think we'd have to agree to use a given template for release voting.
