Looks good, +1 to commit to trunk.
-Hyrum
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 1:39 AM, Vladimir Berezniker wrote:
> [[[
> JavaHL: Support logging of the static method calls
>
> [ in subversion/bindings/javahl/native ]
>
> * JNIStackElement.cpp
> (JNIStackElement): Add logic to deal with NULL jthis, which h
Hi,
Von: Greg Stein [mailto:gst...@gmail.com]
> On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Mark Phippard wrote:
> >...
> > https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=381620
>
> Oh dear. I just looked at this bug report.
>
> The basic problem is that they're talking to a "dumb" HTTP server. To get
> an
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Mark Phippard wrote:
>...
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=381620
Oh dear. I just looked at this bug report.
The basic problem is that they're talking to a "dumb" HTTP server. To
get anywhere, they need a custom server first. It sounds like that
ha
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 8:28 AM, Mark Phippard wrote:
> Keep in mind that this is not about server load, they are looking at
> this from bandwidth. So a cache in front of the server would not help
> them at all. Eclipse.org has a 10MB Internet link that is almost
> always saturated.
>
> Also, if
[[[
JavaHL: Support logging of the static method calls
[ in subversion/bindings/javahl/native ]
* JNIStackElement.cpp
(JNIStackElement): Add logic to deal with NULL jthis, which happens with
static method calls
]]]
Index: subversion/bindings/javahl/native/JNIStackElement.cpp
===
> -Original Message-
> From: Greg Stein [mailto:gst...@gmail.com]
> Sent: dinsdag 5 juni 2012 17:11
> To: dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r1346352 - in
> /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc: questions.c wc_db.c wc_db.h
> workqueue.c
>
> On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 7:31
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 1:10 PM, Paul Burba wrote:
> On #svn-dev today:
>
> [[[
> didn't know it was valid for svn:mergeinfo properties to
> have an empty value
>
> danielsh: Yes, it allows the possibility for a subtree to
> inherit none of its (nearest) parent's mergeinfo.
>
> pburba: ie, preve
On #svn-dev today:
[[[
didn't know it was valid for svn:mergeinfo properties to
have an empty value
danielsh: Yes, it allows the possibility for a subtree to
inherit none of its (nearest) parent's mergeinfo.
pburba: ie, prevent inheritance from an ancestor
danielsh: yes
combined with a no
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Mark Phippard wrote:
>>...
>> The net effect is just the impact that a seemingly small HTTP request
>> can have on a highly trafficked site where those requests start to add
>> up. The main problem here is that
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Mark Phippard wrote:
>...
> no matter what. So whether it is multiple GET requests or a single
> REPORT response is not necessarily the main issue. I think the issue
Right.
> that a server admin has trouble wrapping their head around is all of
> the other reque
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Mark Phippard wrote:
>...
> The net effect is just the impact that a seemingly small HTTP request
> can have on a highly trafficked site where those requests start to add
> up. The main problem here is that the Eclipse update process looks
> for a small index file
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 11:12 AM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> Maybe an Apache HTTP Server person could speak up here. In such scenaries,
> does it matter whether the bazillions of tiny requests are coming in via a
> single connection or over unique ones? Ours would be hitting the server via
> a s
On 06/05/2012 10:49 AM, Mark Phippard wrote:
> Some interesting discussion going on this week at Eclipse.org (none of
> this is specifically related to SVN):
>
> http://eclipsewebmaster.blogspot.ca/2012/06/problems-of-scale.html
>
> Which spawned:
>
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?i
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 7:31 AM, wrote:
> Author: rhuijben
> Date: Tue Jun 5 11:31:17 2012
> New Revision: 1346352
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1346352&view=rev
> Log:
> Revert r1346035, which exposed op_depth to more of the libsvn_wc api than
> really necessary in preparation for a
Some interesting discussion going on this week at Eclipse.org (none of
this is specifically related to SVN):
http://eclipsewebmaster.blogspot.ca/2012/06/problems-of-scale.html
Which spawned:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=381598
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=381620
After all these months, I've been able to retake the activity with this
script and I have done several modifications that resolve the issues
related to the new format of the svn:externals property (further
information in the chapter "Externals Definitions" of the svn-book).
Environment:
Windows 20
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Bert Huijben wrote:
>>
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Johan Corveleyn [mailto:jcor...@gmail.com]
>>> Sent: dinsdag 5 juni 2012 13:08
>>> To: Bert Huijben
>>> Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org
>>> Sub
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Bert Huijben wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Johan Corveleyn [mailto:jcor...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: dinsdag 5 juni 2012 13:08
>> To: Bert Huijben
>> Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Failing test basic_tests.py 29 (check that repos root ge
> -Original Message-
> From: Johan Corveleyn [mailto:jcor...@gmail.com]
> Sent: dinsdag 5 juni 2012 13:08
> To: Bert Huijben
> Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Failing test basic_tests.py 29 (check that repos root gets set on
> checkout)
>
> On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Be
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Bert Huijben wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Johan Corveleyn [mailto:jcor...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: dinsdag 5 juni 2012 02:00
>> To: Branko Čibej
>> Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Failing test basic_tests.py 29 (check that repos root gets s
> -Original Message-
> From: Johan Corveleyn [mailto:jcor...@gmail.com]
> Sent: dinsdag 5 juni 2012 02:00
> To: Branko Čibej
> Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Failing test basic_tests.py 29 (check that repos root gets set on
> checkout)
>
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 6:11 AM, Bra
21 matches
Mail list logo
