On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Mark Phippard <markp...@gmail.com> wrote: >... > no matter what. So whether it is multiple GET requests or a single > REPORT response is not necessarily the main issue. I think the issue
Right. > that a server admin has trouble wrapping their head around is all of > the other requests that at least on the surface seem like they could > be handled with fewer requests (or none at all). So I would be in > favor of continuing to optimize our protocol to remove more of these > requests from the conversation. And I'm on the verge of setting up the caching scenario that I've been talking about for a long while (thinking about the profile in terms of ra_serf and also increasing svn.apache.org perf). When the server-side cache is hot, the load on svn_fs should drop dramatically for typical checkout/update scenarios. Cheers, -g
