> -----Original Message-----
> From: Greg Stein [mailto:gst...@gmail.com]
> Sent: dinsdag 5 juni 2012 17:11
> To: dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r1346352 - in
> /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc: questions.c wc_db.c wc_db.h
> workqueue.c
>
> On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 7:31 AM, <rhuij...@apache.org> wrote:
> > Author: rhuijben
> > Date: Tue Jun 5 11:31:17 2012
> > New Revision: 1346352
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1346352&view=rev
> > Log:
> > Revert r1346035, which exposed op_depth to more of the libsvn_wc api
> than
> > really necessary in preparation for a cleaner and even more optimized
> version.
>
> Thanks. Sounds like you have a new idea?
The only case that really needs optimization would be op_depth 0, called
from the working queue install operation. That could be expressed by a
Boolean instead of an int.
But it would be much cleaner to move most of that code in a new
svn_wc__db_pristine api, which would also allow using a db read lock to get
even higher performance during checkout and update.
Bert
