Branko Čibej wrote on Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 05:29:59 +0200:
> On 27.03.2012 05:23, Greg Stein wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 21:05, Branko Čibej wrote:
> >> On 26.03.2012 17:45, Greg Hudson wrote:
> >>> On 03/26/2012 09:00 AM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> The on-disk cache will contain every
Branko Čibej wrote on Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 03:05:12 +0200:
> On 26.03.2012 17:45, Greg Hudson wrote:
> > On 03/26/2012 09:00 AM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> >> The on-disk cache will contain everything it does today where
> >> plaintext caching is enabled, save that the password won't be
> >> plaint
On 27.03.2012 05:23, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 21:05, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> On 26.03.2012 17:45, Greg Hudson wrote:
>>> On 03/26/2012 09:00 AM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
The on-disk cache will contain everything it does today where
plaintext caching is enabled, save tha
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 21:05, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 26.03.2012 17:45, Greg Hudson wrote:
>> On 03/26/2012 09:00 AM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>>> The on-disk cache will contain everything it does today where
>>> plaintext caching is enabled, save that the password won't be
>>> plaintext, and th
On 26.03.2012 13:11, Julian Foad wrote:
> Mike Dixon wrote:
>
>> It's nice that svn will be able to handle more complicated merges
>> in the future, but please don't remove the existing checks on standard
>> operations that protect me from my own ignorance.
>>
>> I'm also the svn administrator at
On 26.03.2012 17:45, Greg Hudson wrote:
> On 03/26/2012 09:00 AM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>> The on-disk cache will contain everything it does today where
>> plaintext caching is enabled, save that the password won't be
>> plaintext, and there will be a bit of known encrypted text (for
>> passphra
[this should really be on the dev@ list, i mis-addressed my response.]
On 26.03.2012 17:48, Ashod Nakashian wrote:
>>
>> I recommended a two-stage approach to the implementation because
>> (packing and) encrypting the pristines is only half the story, there
>> are a number of interactions with the
pbu...@apache.org wrote on Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 22:29:55 -:
> Author: pburba
> Date: Mon Mar 26 22:29:55 2012
> New Revision: 1305641
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1305641&view=rev
> Log:
> On the inheritable-props branch: Implement getting inherited props over
> ra_svn.
>
> * sub
Greg Stein writes:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 19:18, Kalle Olavi Niemitalo wrote:
>> Daniel Shahaf writes:
>>
>>> Forwarding to maintainers
>>
>> Am I considered a maintainer of psvn.el because COMMITTERS
>> lists me as a dormant partial committer for that?
>
> Nah... I bet Daniel just gathered
On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 21:12 +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Sérgio Basto wrote on Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 20:03:00 +0100:
> > On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 20:33 +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > > Sérgio Basto wrote on Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 19:27:42 +0100:
> > > > On Thu, 2012-03-22 at 08:23 +, Julian Foad
Sérgio Basto wrote on Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 20:03:00 +0100:
> On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 20:33 +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Sérgio Basto wrote on Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 19:27:42 +0100:
> > > On Thu, 2012-03-22 at 08:23 +, Julian Foad wrote:
> > > > Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Philip Mar
On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 20:33 +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Sérgio Basto wrote on Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 19:27:42 +0100:
> > On Thu, 2012-03-22 at 08:23 +, Julian Foad wrote:
> > > Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > >
> > > > Philip Martin wrote:
> > > >> Or you could rebuild the current APR with a
> > >
Sérgio Basto wrote on Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 19:27:42 +0100:
> On Thu, 2012-03-22 at 08:23 +, Julian Foad wrote:
> > Sérgio Basto wrote:
> >
> > > Philip Martin wrote:
> > >> Or you could rebuild the current APR with a
> > >> one-line patch to set ht->seed to 0 in apr_hash.c:apr_hash_make.
>
On Thu, 2012-03-22 at 08:23 +, Julian Foad wrote:
> Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
> > Philip Martin wrote:
> >> Or you could rebuild the current APR with a
> >> one-line patch to set ht->seed to 0 in apr_hash.c:apr_hash_make.
> >
> > I think when subversion receive the result of this apr_function
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 12:10, wrote:
>...
> +++ subversion/site/publish/docs/release-notes/1.8.html Mon Mar 26 16:10:50
> 2012
>...
> +was not.) As of 1.7.1 Subversion
> +
> +prevents new instances of the corruption, but
> +only as of 1.8.0 does 'svnadmin verify'
> +
> +detect instances of tha
Mark Phippard wrote:
> I have been doing some simple playing around merging back and forth
> between a simulated branch and trunk. Overall, it seems to work
> pretty nicely.
Thanks for trying it and reporting back, Mark!
> One thing I noticed (not sure if I would call this a problem but maybe
>
Oh... just saw this. I already updated the wiki page with some stuff
based on another project that I'm working on. The design points in
there were provided by a security expert friend of mine. More below:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 11:45, Greg Hudson wrote:
>...
> Unfortunately, there's more complex
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 11:02:48AM -0400, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 09:43, wrote:
> >...
> > +++ subversion/trunk/tools/dist/release.py Mon Mar 26 13:43:47 2012
> > @@ -21,10 +21,10 @@
> >
> >
> > # About this script:
> > -# This script is intended to simplify creating Subver
- Original Message -
> From: Daniel Shahaf
> To: Hyrum K Wright
> Cc: Ashod Nakashian ; "dev@subversion.apache.org"
> ; Philip Martin ; Greg
> Stein
> Sent: Monday, March 26, 2012 5:30 PM
> Subject: Re: Compressed Pristines (Design Doc)
>
> Hyrum K Wright wrote on Fri, Mar 23, 2012 a
On 03/26/2012 09:00 AM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> The on-disk cache will contain everything it does today where
> plaintext caching is enabled, save that the password won't be
> plaintext, and there will be a bit of known encrypted text (for
> passphrase validation).
Is it important to be able to
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 09:43, wrote:
>...
> +++ subversion/trunk/tools/dist/release.py Mon Mar 26 13:43:47 2012
> @@ -21,10 +21,10 @@
>
>
> # About this script:
> -# This script is intended to simplify creating Subversion releases, by
> -# automating as much as is possible. It works well w
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 5:36 AM, Julian Foad wrote:
> If anyone wants to try the new symmetric merge code, it's basically in
> place. It's not finished. It's enabled
> with '--symmetric' command-line option.
I have been doing some simple playing around merging back and forth
between a simulat
"C. Michael Pilato" writes:
> On 03/26/2012 09:08 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> How would you implement encryption? We don't currently have encryption
>> code in the core.
>
> Correct. We'd need to pull in additional dependencies that have freely
> available implementations on all our supported p
On 03/26/2012 09:08 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> How would you implement encryption? We don't currently have encryption
> code in the core.
Correct. We'd need to pull in additional dependencies that have freely
available implementations on all our supported platforms. Blowfish, 3DES,
or somesuch.
C. Michael Pilato wrote on Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 09:00:19 -0400:
> On 03/25/2012 12:48 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > C. Michael Pilato wrote on Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 12:21:20 -0400:
> >> But the benefits to the developers will be noticeable. Currently, the use
> >> of the various "outsourced" provide
On 03/25/2012 12:48 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> C. Michael Pilato wrote on Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 12:21:20 -0400:
>> But the benefits to the developers will be noticeable. Currently, the use
>> of the various "outsourced" providers is a mess. Every time we want to add
>> a new provider, we have to a
Any follow-ups on this? We need to support Ruby 1.9 eventually and
it would be great to get these patches into a state where they can
be committed.
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 12:32:58PM +, Philip Martin wrote:
> Philip Martin writes:
>
> > The line is:
> >
> >require "test/unit/ui/testrunne
Daniel Shahaf wrote on Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 14:30:34 +0200:
> I haven't found much so far
(Provided as an observation; not implying it's a problem.)
Hyrum K Wright wrote on Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 13:54:25 -0500:
> As mentioned elsewhere, I too was surprised by the choice of a custom
> container, though I think you make a good argument for it. One
> simplification I was thinking about is this: what if the container
> only needed to support add an
Julian Foad wrote on Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 13:00:58 +0100:
> Ashod Nakashian wrote:
> [...]
>
> > *Let's vote on a design and a plan to get us there.* At this point I can
> > only wait for everyone to catch up, do their tests and run their numbers
> > and
> > vote on what they think will best be
Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> * subversion/tests/cmdline/svntest/sandbox.py
>> (Sandbox.get_tempname): Fix a bug: don't remove the directory before
>> allocating another filename in it.
>
> This seems to have broken export_tests.py 19 20: they fail if I run them twice
> without removing svn-te
Ashod Nakashian wrote:
[...]
> *Let's vote on a design and a plan to get us there.* At this point I can
> only wait for everyone to catch up, do their tests and run their numbers and
> vote on what they think will best benefit the community in the long run.
>
> ::Subversion Compressed Pristines
Greg Stein wrote on Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 14:52:41 -0400:
> On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 13:35, wrote:
> >...
> > +++ subversion/site/publish/docs/release-notes/1.8.html Sun Mar 25 17:35:32
> > 2012
> >...
> > +was not.) As of 1.7.1 Subversion > +href="http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branche
Mike Dixon wrote:
> On 3/22/2012 10:19 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> On 22.03.2012 22:33, Julian Foad wrote:
>>> Branko Čibej wrote:
I'm confused. What additional checks would --reintegrate do that your
common or garden merge would skip? What kind of check do you think you
can saf
On 26 March 2012 11:53, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> 2012/3/25 Branko Čibej :
>> On 22.03.2012 17:01, Branko Čibej wrote:
>>> On 22.03.2012 16:50, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Branko Čibej wrote on Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 16:37:24 +0100:
> [..]
>>
>> Based on these observations, it's clear that the implementati
I don't know how I missed this mail, but I have. Thanks to Ivan for bringing it
to my attention. Please see inline.
- Original Message -
> From: Branko Čibej
> To: dev@subversion.apache.org
> Cc:
> Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2012 4:02 AM
> Subject: Re: Compressed Pristines (Design Doc)
>
2012/3/25 Branko Čibej :
> On 22.03.2012 17:01, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> On 22.03.2012 16:50, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>>> Branko Čibej wrote on Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 16:37:24 +0100:
[..]
>
> Based on these observations, it's clear that the implementation should
> proceed as follows:
>
> Step 1: Just comp
- Original Message -
> From: Markus Schaber
> To: Ashod Nakashian
> Cc: "dev@subversion.apache.org"
> Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2012 11:28 PM
> Subject: AW: AW: Compressed Pristines (Custom Format?)
>
> Hi,
>
>> Von: Ashod Nakashian [mailto:ashodnakash...@yahoo.com]
>>
>> >The disad
38 matches
Mail list logo
