On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 07:58:10AM -0500, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 5:45 AM, Philip Martin
> wrote:
> > s...@feb17.org writes:
> >
> >> A little more information on this. I have probably rebuilt svn about 20
> >> times tonight from scratch, with
Thanks to everyone who cont
On 03/13/2012 01:04 PM, Julian Foad wrote:
> C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>> On 03/13/2012 11:39 AM, julianf...@apache.org wrote:
>>> * subversion/include/svn_repos.h
>>>(svn_repos_fs_get_mergeinfo): Clarify that paths start with '/'.
>>
>> Explicitly mentioned the "fspath" term?
>>
>>The paths
[CC -= commits@]
C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> On 03/13/2012 11:39 AM, julianf...@apache.org wrote:
>> * subversion/include/svn_repos.h
>> (svn_repos_fs_get_mergeinfo): Clarify that paths start with '/'.
>
> Explicitly mentioned the "fspath" term?
>
> The paths in @a paths, and the keys of @a c
On 03/13/2012 11:39 AM, julianf...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: julianfoad
> Date: Tue Mar 13 15:39:21 2012
> New Revision: 1300197
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1300197&view=rev
> Log:
> * subversion/include/svn_repos.h
> (svn_repos_fs_get_mergeinfo): Clarify that paths start with '/
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 10:12, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
>...
> I've no doubt *you* know what it is, but this is a public list. And
Ah. Didn't realize we'd moved from code review to public discussion :-P
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 6:18 AM, Hyrum K Wright
wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:11 AM, Joe Swatosh wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 10:39 PM, Joe Swatosh wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 9:46 PM, Joe Swatosh wrote:
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 2:44 AM, Philip Martin
wrote:
>>
>>
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 8:45 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
>
> On Mar 13, 2012 9:34 AM, "Hyrum K Wright" wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 1:09 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
>> > On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 00:55, wrote:
>> >>...
>> >> +++ subversion/trunk/subversion/tests/cmdline/svntest/main.py Tue Mar
>> >>
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 09:45, Greg Stein wrote:
>
> On Mar 13, 2012 9:34 AM, "Hyrum K Wright" wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 1:09 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
>> > On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 00:55, wrote:
>> >>...
>> >> +++ subversion/trunk/subversion/tests/cmdline/svntest/main.py Tue Mar
>> >> 1
On Mar 13, 2012 9:34 AM, "Hyrum K Wright" wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 1:09 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 00:55, wrote:
> >>...
> >> +++ subversion/trunk/subversion/tests/cmdline/svntest/main.py Tue Mar
13 04:55:26 2012
> >> @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ import optparse
> >> impo
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 1:00 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 22:21, wrote:
>>...
>> +++ subversion/trunk/subversion/tests/cmdline/svntest/wc.py Tue Mar 13
>> 02:21:36 2012
>> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ import re
>> import urllib
>> import logging
>> import pprint
>> +import cStringIO
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 12:57 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 22:21, wrote:
>> Author: hwright
>> Date: Tue Mar 13 02:21:36 2012
>> New Revision: 1299956
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1299956&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Fix pretty-printing of some datastructures broken in r
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 1:09 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 00:55, wrote:
>>...
>> +++ subversion/trunk/subversion/tests/cmdline/svntest/main.py Tue Mar 13
>> 04:55:26 2012
>> @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ import optparse
>> import xml
>> import urllib
>> import logging
>> +import cStri
Mario Brandt wrote on Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 11:13:10 +0100:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 10:36, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Do you see the same set of FAILs in both cases? (The tests are known to
> > PASS against 2.2 on all platforms and FS backends; so the fact you see
> > you see 68 fails ind
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 5:45 AM, Philip Martin
wrote:
> s...@feb17.org writes:
>
>> A little more information on this. I have probably rebuilt svn about 20
>> times tonight from scratch, with
>> latest source from repository, and after upgrading libtools, autoconf, apr
>> etc. It failed the ma
Ashod Nakashian writes:
> XFAIL: update_tests.py 66: update locally modified file to equal versions
> Summary of test results:
> 1594 tests PASSED
> 47 tests SKIPPED
> 42 tests XFAILED (1 WORK-IN-PROGRESS)
That's OK. XFAILs are expected fails, generally things that have not
yet been imple
>
> From: Stefan Sperling
>To: s...@feb17.org
>Cc: Philip Martin ; dev@subversion.apache.org
>Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 3:44 AM
>Subject: Re: Segfault in SVN 1.7.4
>
>On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 10:37:43PM -0700, s...@feb17.org wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 0
s...@feb17.org writes:
> A little more information on this. I have probably rebuilt svn about 20
> times tonight from scratch, with
> latest source from repository, and after upgrading libtools, autoconf, apr
> etc. It failed the make check
> tests every time. I finally tried a minimal config
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 10:37:43PM -0700, s...@feb17.org wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 08:30:42PM -0700, s...@feb17.org wrote:
> > > s...@feb17.org writes:
> > >
> > > > to realize it was segfaulting on the linux side. I've upgraded to
> > > > 1.7.4 and the problem remains. I finally ran the
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 10:36, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Do you see the same set of FAILs in both cases? (The tests are known to
> PASS against 2.2 on all platforms and FS backends; so the fact you see
> you see 68 fails indicates something's wrong, but it is likely
> independent of the httpd-2
Mario Brandt wrote on Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 22:33:14 +0100:
> Hi,
> the tests took felt forever. However.
>
>
> Against apache 2.2 without the patch
>
> C:\python27\python win-tests.py -r --httpd-dir=C:\Apache22-x86
> Summary of test results:
> 1452 tests PASSED
> 73 tests SKIPPED
> 21 tes
20 matches
Mail list logo
