The addition of "tracing" to svn_error_t in 1.7 currently uses a special message
string "traced call". Instead of doing this, can we safely add an svn_boolean_t
to svn_error_t the indicates if it is a traced error?
While svn_error_t is public, I'm hoping most people are creating them with
svn
On 12/23/10 2:07 AM, Julian Foad wrote:
bl...@apache.org wrote:
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1052151&view=rev
Log:
Remove a gcc "implicit conversion shortens 64-bit value into a 32-bit
value" warning.
tools/server-side/svn-populate-node-origins-index.c:140: warning: format
‘%ld’ expec
On 12/23/10 3:01 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
I've made a quick sketch --- looks good?
The suggestions look good.
We could add some more tests, checking the behavior with SVN_NO_ERROR input and
one where all errors are tracing, which should return an error from
SVN_ERR_ASSERT().
As an aside, t
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 11:43 PM, Gavin Beau Baumanis
wrote:
> On 23/12/2010, at 11:36 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 3:44 AM, Gavin Beau Baumanis
>> wrote:
>>> Hi Johan,
>>
>> Hi Gavin. Thanks for your interest. It's a nice problem isn't it?
>
> Yes - it "should be" so v
On 23/12/2010, at 11:36 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 3:44 AM, Gavin Beau Baumanis
> wrote:
>> Hi Johan,
>
> Hi Gavin. Thanks for your interest. It's a nice problem isn't it?
Yes - it "should be" so very simple... but a little thought - and before you
know it - it's not
Stefan,
Thanks for the long reply.
I find myself in a somewhat humorous situation here. One of the people
who works for me has wondered, for some time, if it made sense for us
to have a support contract with one of the providers of those around
svn. So, when we hit this particular problem, he fel
On 12/22/2010 07:21 PM, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 1:15 AM, Kamesh Jayachandran wrote:
On 12/22/2010 09:38 AM, bl...@apache.org wrote:
Author: blair
Date: Wed Dec 22 04:08:14 2010
New Revision: 1051745
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1051745&view=rev
Log:
Update test
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 08:01:56AM -0500, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Hello SVN development community,
>
> Yesterday, a sales person from a company which I will not name here
> sent us an email message that I will quote, below.
>
> There's nothing wrong with companies selling the services of
> cont
Hello SVN development community,
Yesterday, a sales person from a company which I will not name here
sent us an email message that I will quote, below.
There's nothing wrong with companies selling the services of
contributors. However, this email message claims that the 'only' way
that an issue i
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 2:33 AM, stsivaraj wrote:
>
> Hi All,
> I am using Subversion version1.2 and need one favour. I have
> written code to delete particular revision from SVN Repository.
> Unfortunately, i couldn't delete particular version from repository. Any one
> can response me..
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 3:44 AM, Gavin Beau Baumanis
wrote:
> Hi Johan,
Hi Gavin. Thanks for your interest. It's a nice problem isn't it?
> I was intrigued by your requirement to create a large file for testing.
> I remember from a really long time ago when I learnt C, that we used a
> specific
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Julian Foad wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-12-23, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> Daniel Shahaf wrote on Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 13:25:40 +0200:
>> > Johan Corveleyn wrote on Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 01:51:08 +0100:
>> > > Yes, that's a good idea. I'll try to spend some time on that. But
>From IRC:
julianf: We changed error codes in libsvn_wc all over the place.
I don't think we see strict error codes as part of the documented
behavior, unless it is in the function documentation
Bert: OK, but I wonder if we really should accept changes to a
libsvn_client response (which this is
Daniel Shahaf writes:
> Noorul Islam K M wrote on Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 15:53:58 +0530:
>
>>
>> Forwarding one of the threads to dev@ with [PATCH] tag so that this gets
>> attention of more people. Julian said on IRC,
>>
>> noorul: Now we're into the realm of changing behaviour. If the
>> erro
On Thu, 2010-12-23, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Daniel Shahaf wrote on Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 13:25:40 +0200:
> > Johan Corveleyn wrote on Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 01:51:08 +0100:
> > > Yes, that's a good idea. I'll try to spend some time on that. But I'm
> > > wondering about a good way to write such a scrip
Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Julian Foad wrote on Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 16:43:16 +:
> > GCC.
> >
> > From the output of "make":
> >
> > [...]/libtool --tag=CC --silent --mode=link gcc -Wno-system-headers
> > -Wold-style-definition -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wpointer-arith
> > -Wwrite-strings -W
Tijn Porcelijn wrote on Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 00:09:32 -0800:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Here's my previous mail as plain text (utf8).
>
Thanks, much better.
(I forgot to say that I asked for plain texts only in future mails ---
i.e., I didn't mean to ask you to re-send this one --- but thanks anyway
for
Daniel Shahaf wrote on Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 13:25:40 +0200:
> Johan Corveleyn wrote on Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 01:51:08 +0100:
> > On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Philip Martin
> > wrote:
> > > Johan Corveleyn writes:
> > >
> > >> On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 11:19 AM, Philip Martin
> > >> wrote:
> >
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 01:51:08 +0100:
> As a first attempt, I quickly hacked up a small shell script, writing
> out lines in a for loop, one by one, with a fixed string together with
> the line number (index of the iteration). But that's too slow (1
> lines of 70 bytes,
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 01:51:08 +0100:
> On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Philip Martin
> wrote:
> > Johan Corveleyn writes:
> >
> >> On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 11:19 AM, Philip Martin
> >> wrote:
> >>> Johan Corveleyn writes:
> >>>
> This makes the diff algorithm anot
Julian Foad wrote on Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 16:43:16 +:
> On Wed, 2010-12-22, Blair Zajac wrote:
> > On 12/22/10 4:36 AM, Julian Foad wrote:
> > > subversion/libsvn_repos/commit.c:648: no previous prototype for
> > > 'svn_repos__post_commit_error_str'
> >
> > Thanks, fixed in r1051968.
> >
> >
Noorul Islam K M wrote on Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 15:53:58 +0530:
>
> Forwarding one of the threads to dev@ with [PATCH] tag so that this gets
> attention of more people. Julian said on IRC,
>
> noorul: Now we're into the realm of changing behaviour. If the error
> code returned from libsvn
Blair Zajac wrote on Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 22:26:15 -0800:
> On 12/22/10 4:38 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> Blair Zajac wrote on Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 13:22:11 -0800:
>>> On 12/22/10 10:56 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Blair Zajac wrote on Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 10:45:12 -0800:
> It seems the best th
Forwarding one of the threads to dev@ with [PATCH] tag so that this gets
attention of more people. Julian said on IRC,
noorul: Now we're into the realm of changing behaviour. If the error
code returned from libsvn_client is different in 1.7 from what it
was in 1.6, maybe that
bl...@apache.org wrote:
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1052151&view=rev
> Log:
> Remove a gcc "implicit conversion shortens 64-bit value into a 32-bit
> value" warning.
tools/server-side/svn-populate-node-origins-index.c:140: warning: format
‘%ld’ expects type ‘long int’, but argument 3 h
Noorul Islam K M writes:
> Julian Foad writes:
>
>> Re:
>> * "svn info ^/b" -> "Not a valid URL"; should be "path '/b' not found
>> in revision REV"?
>>
>> On Wed, 2010-12-08, Noorul Islam K M wrote:
>> [...]
>>> One of the solution that you suggested was to keep what the existing
>>> code is
Julian Foad writes:
> Re:
> * "svn info ^/b" -> "Not a valid URL"; should be "path '/b' not found
> in revision REV"?
>
> On Wed, 2010-12-08, Noorul Islam K M wrote:
> [...]
>> One of the solution that you suggested was to keep what the existing
>> code is doing but saying something more helpfu
Hi All,
I am using Subversion version1.2 and need one favour. I have
written code to delete particular revision from SVN Repository.
Unfortunately, i couldn't delete particular version from repository. Any one
can response me.. how to delete?
public void deleteDocRevision(String collDir,
Hi Daniel,
Here's my previous mail as plain text (utf8).
tijn
On 2010-12-22 14:02, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>
> Forwarding back to the list.
>
> Tijn Porcelijn wrote on Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 01:54:07 -0800:
> > Hi Daniel,
> >
> > I guess you're right. It makes more sense to echo the external URL
> >
29 matches
Mail list logo
