> -Original Message-
> From: Eric Zeitler [mailto:eric.zeit...@gmail.com]
> Sent: vrijdag 23 juli 2010 1:48
> To: Bert Huijben
> Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [Patch] - Fix compilation of direct_uri-test.c on OS/2
>
> On 7/22/2010 4:02 PM, Bert Huijben wrote:
> >
> >> ---
On 7/22/2010 4:02 PM, Bert Huijben wrote:
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Eric Zeitler [mailto:eric.zeit...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: donderdag 22 juli 2010 23:50
>> To: dev@subversion.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [Patch] - Fix compilation of direct_uri-test.c on OS/2
>>
>> Matthew Bentham artvp
> -Original Message-
> From: Eric Zeitler [mailto:eric.zeit...@gmail.com]
> Sent: donderdag 22 juli 2010 23:50
> To: dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [Patch] - Fix compilation of direct_uri-test.c on OS/2
>
> Matthew Bentham artvps.com> writes:
>
> >
> > On 28/06/2010 10:29, Be
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Bert Huijben wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: pbu...@apache.org [mailto:pbu...@apache.org]
>> Sent: donderdag 22 juli 2010 21:43
>> To: comm...@subversion.apache.org
>> Subject: svn commit: r966822 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion:
>> libsvn_clien
Matthew Bentham artvps.com> writes:
>
> On 28/06/2010 10:29, Bert Huijben wrote:
> >
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Julian Foad [mailto:julian.foad wandisco.com]
> >> Sent: maandag 28 juni 2010 10:48
> >> To: Paul Smedley
> >> Cc: dev subversion.apache.org
> >> Subject: Re: [Pa
> -Original Message-
> From: pbu...@apache.org [mailto:pbu...@apache.org]
> Sent: donderdag 22 juli 2010 21:43
> To: comm...@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: svn commit: r966822 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion:
> libsvn_client/repos_diff.c tests/cmdline/merge_tests.py
>
> Author: pburb
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:d...@daniel.shahaf.name]
> Sent: donderdag 22 juli 2010 20:58
> To: dev@subversion.apache.org
> Cc: comm...@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r966770 - in
> /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc: copy.c log.c log.h merge.c
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 08:18:17PM -, artag...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: artagnon
> Date: Thu Jul 22 20:18:16 2010
> New Revision: 966841
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=966841&view=rev
> Log:
> * subversion/svnrdump/svnrdump.c (replay_range, main, usage): Fake a
> revision 0 lik
On 07/22/2010 03:01 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> C. Michael Pilato wrote on Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 14:53:51 -0400:
>> On 07/22/2010 02:12 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>>> Hrm... 'svn relocate' just calls svn_client_relocate() as well. I don't
>>> see any calls to svn_wc_is_wc_rootX() or anything. Do
C. Michael Pilato wrote on Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 14:53:51 -0400:
> On 07/22/2010 02:12 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> > Hrm... 'svn relocate' just calls svn_client_relocate() as well. I don't
> > see any calls to svn_wc_is_wc_rootX() or anything. Does that allow partial
> > relocations, too?
>
>
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 09:53:02PM +0300, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Stefan Sperling wrote on Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 20:11:23 +0200:
> > On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 07:59:42PM +0200, Bert Huijben wrote:
> > > Shouldn't we relocate the complete working copy, starting by the working
> > > copy root instead of
rhuij...@apache.org wrote on Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 17:44:41 -:
> Author: rhuijben
> Date: Thu Jul 22 17:44:41 2010
> New Revision: 966770
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=966770&view=rev
> Log:
> Replace the file-move loggy operation with a file-move wq operation.
>
> This to move awa
Stefan Sperling wrote on Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 20:11:23 +0200:
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 07:59:42PM +0200, Bert Huijben wrote:
> > Shouldn't we relocate the complete working copy, starting by the working
> > copy root instead of just the operation anchor?
>
So "cd notes; svn up commit-access-temp
On 07/22/2010 02:12 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> Hrm... 'svn relocate' just calls svn_client_relocate() as well. I don't
> see any calls to svn_wc_is_wc_rootX() or anything. Does that allow partial
> relocations, too?
To answer my own question: Yes. 'svn relocate', when run on a working cop
On 07/22/2010 02:11 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> I'm thinking a callback mechanism to ask users if they really
> want to relocate to the new URL would be nice. And I agree that
> the entire working copy should be relocated (should be easy in WC-NG,
> right? :)
If you read the BRANCH-README, you'll
On 07/22/2010 02:09 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> On 07/22/2010 01:59 PM, Bert Huijben wrote:
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: cmpil...@apache.org [mailto:cmpil...@apache.org]
>>> Sent: donderdag 22 juli 2010 19:55
>>> To: comm...@subversion.apache.org
>>> Subject: svn commit: r966774 - /s
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 07:59:42PM +0200, Bert Huijben wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: cmpil...@apache.org [mailto:cmpil...@apache.org]
> > Sent: donderdag 22 juli 2010 19:55
> > To: comm...@subversion.apache.org
> > Subject: svn commit: r966774 - /subversion/branches/issue-27
On 07/22/2010 01:59 PM, Bert Huijben wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: cmpil...@apache.org [mailto:cmpil...@apache.org]
>> Sent: donderdag 22 juli 2010 19:55
>> To: comm...@subversion.apache.org
>> Subject: svn commit: r966774 - /subversion/branches/issue-2779-
>> dev/subversion/libsvn_
> -Original Message-
> From: cmpil...@apache.org [mailto:cmpil...@apache.org]
> Sent: donderdag 22 juli 2010 19:55
> To: comm...@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: svn commit: r966774 - /subversion/branches/issue-2779-
> dev/subversion/libsvn_client/update.c
>
> Author: cmpilato
> Date: Th
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 10:03 AM, Bert Huijben wrote:
> Fixed this issue on trunk in r966747.
>
>> Bert
Excellent! Thanks, Bert!
> -Original Message-
> From: Bert Huijben [mailto:b...@qqmail.nl]
> Sent: donderdag 22 juli 2010 17:54
> To: 'Mark Hanson'; dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: RE: --native-eol not applied to externals
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Mark Hanson [mailto:mbh...@gmail.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Hanson [mailto:mbh...@gmail.com]
> Sent: donderdag 22 juli 2010 17:25
> To: dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: --native-eol not applied to externals
>
> The following commands demonstrate what seems to be a bug with
> --native-eol and externals. Two r
On 07/22/2010 11:33 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 10:56:11AM -0400, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>> The error you show above happens deep inside the FS implementations' DAG
>> layer, as a sanity check on a text-base before apply a delta to it. It's
>> probably comparing the chec
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 10:56:11AM -0400, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> svnsync doesn't do any checksum verification. That work is done by deeper
> levels. But you provide no support for the implication that Subversion
> didn't attempt to verify checksums at all the reasonable times.
Looks like I n
The following commands demonstrate what seems to be a bug with
--native-eol and externals. Two repositories are created. The first
has an external link to the second. Text files with
svn:eol-style=native are added in both repositories. When the first
repository is exported with a non-default --
On 07/22/2010 10:11 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> So we should not have added the additional checksums in the first place?
> You might as well point fingers at the old backends for not storing checksums,
> rather than at Hyrum trying to do his best with what he had.
You have to define "his best" he
On 22 July 2010 23:59, Bert Huijben wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Matthew Bentham [mailto:mj...@artvps.com]
>> Sent: donderdag 22 juli 2010 15:32
>> To: s...@stsp.name
>> Cc: dave b; Stephen Butler; Bob Archer; Bolstridge, Andrew;
>> dev@subversion.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: BU
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 09:00:25AM -0400, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> On 07/22/2010 06:15 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 09:53:35AM +0100, Philip Martin wrote:
> >> Perhaps we could just have one checksum that includes all the property
> >> names and values?
> >
> > I'd like
> -Original Message-
> From: Matthew Bentham [mailto:mj...@artvps.com]
> Sent: donderdag 22 juli 2010 15:32
> To: s...@stsp.name
> Cc: dave b; Stephen Butler; Bob Archer; Bolstridge, Andrew;
> dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: BUG: when performing a checkout use the cased url as in
On 07/22/2010 09:40 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> C. Michael Pilato wrote on Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 09:00:25 -0400:
>> Now for some nit-picking. This format:
>>
>>Header-Name: (PROPNAME) CHECKSUM
>>
>> is unnecessarily complex and, I bet, will catch at least person offguard
>> when their dumpstream
On 22 July 2010 23:08, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 10:58:44PM +1000, dave b wrote:
>> Can we at least agree that the current state is suboptimal ?
>
> Sure, but it's the state of windows that is suboptimal.
> There simply isn't anything we can reasonably do about it.
>
> Stefa
C. Michael Pilato wrote on Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 09:00:25 -0400:
> Now for some nit-picking. This format:
>
>Header-Name: (PROPNAME) CHECKSUM
>
> is unnecessarily complex and, I bet, will catch at least person offguard
> when their dumpstream contains a property name with a ')' character in i
On 22/07/2010 14:08, s...@stsp.name wrote:
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 10:58:44PM +1000, dave b wrote:
Can we at least agree that the current state is suboptimal ?
Sure, but it's the state of windows that is suboptimal.
There simply isn't anything we can reasonably do about it.
Stefan
What if
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 10:58:44PM +1000, dave b wrote:
> Can we at least agree that the current state is suboptimal ?
Sure, but it's the state of windows that is suboptimal.
There simply isn't anything we can reasonably do about it.
Stefan
On 07/22/2010 06:15 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 09:53:35AM +0100, Philip Martin wrote:
>> Perhaps we could just have one checksum that includes all the property
>> names and values?
>
> I'd like loaders to be able to tell users which properties are
> corrupted.
This chang
On 22 July 2010 19:55, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 05:10:01PM +1000, dave b wrote:
>> Perhaps if it is possible, svn on windows can use the posix api? - I
>> don't know how that works :)
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Windows_Services_for_UNIX#cite_note-6
> -> http:/
Bert Huijben wrote:
> I think this needs a backport branch.
> svn_uri_canonicalize() is not publicly available in 1.6 and the private
> variant that is in the 1.6 libsvn_subr didn't perform url encoding fixes.
> That was only added on trunk a few months ago.
I created a backport branch for this
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 09:53:35AM +0100, Philip Martin wrote:
> s...@apache.org writes:
>
> > Author: stsp
> > Date: Tue Jul 20 16:14:53 2010
> > New Revision: 965892
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=965892&view=rev
> > Log:
> > Make svnadmin dump print headers containing MD5 and SHA
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 05:10:01PM +1000, dave b wrote:
> Perhaps if it is possible, svn on windows can use the posix api? - I
> don't know how that works :)
It doesn't work quite like that. Subversion uses APR (the apache
portable runtime) for portability. This means that file i/o, memory
handlin
s...@apache.org writes:
> Author: stsp
> Date: Tue Jul 20 16:14:53 2010
> New Revision: 965892
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=965892&view=rev
> Log:
> Make svnadmin dump print headers containing MD5 and SHA1 checksums of
> property content, as was already done for file content. Checksum
"Bert Huijben" writes:
> It looks like this patch breaks the python bindings.
Right. r966539 switched to using svn_stream_open_unique, the tests
now pass on my Linux box.
--
Philip
On 22 July 2010 16:49, Stephen Butler wrote:
>
> On Jul 22, 2010, at 7:10 , dave b wrote:
>
>> On 22 July 2010 05:47, Bob Archer wrote:
>>>
On 22 July 2010 03:12, dave b wrote:
> On 22 July 2010 02:58, Bolstridge, Andrew
> wrote:
>>> -Original Message-
>>> excuse to
42 matches
Mail list logo
