> -----Original Message-----
> From: cmpil...@apache.org [mailto:cmpil...@apache.org]
> Sent: donderdag 22 juli 2010 19:55
> To: comm...@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: svn commit: r966774 - /subversion/branches/issue-2779-
> dev/subversion/libsvn_client/update.c
>
> Author: cmpilato
> Date: Thu Jul 22 17:54:49 2010
> New Revision: 966774
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=966774&view=rev
> Log:
> On the 'issue-2779-dev' branch: Get 'svn update' following redirects!
>
> * subversion/libsvn_client/update.c
> (update_internal): Check for a corrected URL from the RA subsystem
> and, upon finding one, relocate the working copy before the update.
>
>
> Modified:
> subversion/branches/issue-2779-
> dev/subversion/libsvn_client/update.c
>
> Modified: subversion/branches/issue-2779-
> dev/subversion/libsvn_client/update.c
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branches/issue-2779-
> dev/subversion/libsvn_client/update.c?rev=966774&r1=966773&r2=966774&vi
> ew=diff
> =======================================================================
> =======
> --- subversion/branches/issue-2779-
> dev/subversion/libsvn_client/update.c (original)
> +++ subversion/branches/issue-2779-
> dev/subversion/libsvn_client/update.c Thu Jul 22 17:54:49 2010
> @@ -108,6 +108,7 @@ update_internal(svn_revnum_t *result_rev
> const svn_ra_reporter3_t *reporter;
> void *report_baton;
> const char *anchor_url;
> + const char *corrected_url;
> const char *target;
> const char *repos_root;
> svn_error_t *err;
> @@ -192,10 +193,20 @@ update_internal(svn_revnum_t *result_rev
> : NULL;
>
> /* Open an RA session for the URL */
> - SVN_ERR(svn_client__open_ra_session_internal(&ra_session, NULL,
> anchor_url,
> + SVN_ERR(svn_client__open_ra_session_internal(&ra_session,
> &corrected_url,
> + anchor_url,
> anchor_abspath, NULL,
> TRUE,
> TRUE, ctx, pool));
>
> + /* If we got a corrected URL from the RA subsystem, we'll need to
> + relocate our working copy first. */
> + if (corrected_url)
> + {
> + SVN_ERR(svn_client_relocate(anchor_abspath, anchor_url,
> corrected_url,
> + TRUE, ctx, pool));
> + anchor_url = corrected_url;
> + }
> +
Shouldn't we relocate the complete working copy, starting by the working copy
root instead of just the operation anchor?
This gives you a partly relocated working copy without proper notifications to
the user. (In AnkhSVN there are a lot of users that update some part of their
working copy. I would assume that this also applies to other clients)
Bert
