On 07/22/2010 02:09 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote: > On 07/22/2010 01:59 PM, Bert Huijben wrote: >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: cmpil...@apache.org [mailto:cmpil...@apache.org] >>> Sent: donderdag 22 juli 2010 19:55 >>> To: comm...@subversion.apache.org >>> Subject: svn commit: r966774 - /subversion/branches/issue-2779- >>> dev/subversion/libsvn_client/update.c >>> >>> Author: cmpilato >>> Date: Thu Jul 22 17:54:49 2010 >>> New Revision: 966774 >>> >>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=966774&view=rev >>> Log: >>> On the 'issue-2779-dev' branch: Get 'svn update' following redirects! > > [...] > >> Shouldn't we relocate the complete working copy, starting by the working >> copy root instead of just the operation anchor? >> >> This gives you a partly relocated working copy without proper >> notifications to the user. (In AnkhSVN there are a lot of users that >> update some part of their working copy. I would assume that this also >> applies to other clients) > > Ooh! Good catch, Bert! > > (No notifications have been added yet. I believe they should be present in > all cases, working copy root or otherwise. I just haven't coded them yet.)
Hrm... 'svn relocate' just calls svn_client_relocate() as well. I don't see any calls to svn_wc_is_wc_rootX() or anything. Does that allow partial relocations, too? -- C. Michael Pilato <cmpil...@collab.net> CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
