Hello,
Attached script demonstrates the problem. Relocating part of the working
copy (to use another protocol, i.e. https instead of https) creates a
versioned obstruction (disjoint working copy in place of versioned
directory).
When opening this working copy, Subversion however descends int
Update: I have found a problem in our old entries-mapping code which
incorrectly handles inherited copyfrom information. I believe that
I've fixed that problem, but some other problems have rippled out from
there.
Will work more on it later...
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 15:14, Greg Stein wrote:
> FY
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Hyrum K. Wright
wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 1:01 PM, Hyrum K. Wright <
> hyrum_wri...@mail.utexas.edu> wrote:
>
>> 1.6.10 tarballs are up, the magic revision is r929659:
>>
>> http://orac.ece.utexas.edu/pub/svn/1.6.10/
>>
>> Download, test, sign and send your
C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> OVER NEON:
>
> PASS: merge_tests.py 45: target inherits mergeinfo from nearest ancestor
> PASS: merge_tests.py 77: subtrees added after start of merge range are ok
> PASS: merge_tests.py 79: merge --reintegrate with renamed file on branch
> PASS: merge_tests.py 124:
[ copying dev@, where we should probably continue this discussion ]
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Bob Archer wrote:
> I just read this and had a few questions. I'm not sure if this list or
> the dev list is more appropriate.
>
> I think this was somewhat addressed in the posting but my questi
FYI:
After applying Bert's r930281 fix, this revision still breaks merge
tests 34 and 134.
Investigating...
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 00:53, wrote:
> Author: gstein
> Date: Fri Apr 2 04:53:22 2010
> New Revision: 930162
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=930162&view=rev
> Log:
> Remove EN
David Darj writes:
> Now all is fine.
Since you now know what is wrong and what works, would you like to
prepare a patch to fix INSTALL?
--
Philip
Paul Burba wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 8:52 AM, Paul Burba wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 8:08 AM, Paul Burba wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 7:40 AM, Julian Foad
>>> wrote:
On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 11:43 +0100, Julian Foad wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-03-31 at 13:01 -0600, Hyrum K. Wrig
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 6:07 PM, Paul Burba wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 9:50 AM, Philip Martin
> wrote:
>> Philip Martin writes:
>>
>>> Paul Burba writes:
>>>
> My bad, I didn't pass --url! I was still half asleep when I did that.
> The tests pass for me over ra_neon, but all excep
Last week, five of Subversion's developers -- myself, Hyrum Wright (who
helped me author this lengthy mail), Greg Stein, Stefan Sperling, and Karl
Fogel ("we", henceforth) -- met in New York City to evaluate Subversion's
current trajectory as a project and to jointly develop suggestions for any
cou
On 2010-04-02 14:59, David Darj wrote:
On 2010-04-02 13:03, Philip Martin wrote:
David Darj writes:
Do I need to do some additional setup for authorization in Apache
other then configure for mod_dav_svn
and mod_authz_svn as stated in INSTALL section E.6 ?
That appears to be out-of-date, try
On 2010-04-02 13:03, Philip Martin wrote:
David Darj writes:
Do I need to do some additional setup for authorization in Apache
other then configure for mod_dav_svn
and mod_authz_svn as stated in INSTALL section E.6 ?
That appears to be out-of-date, try
http://svn.apache.org/repos/a
On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 11:06:32AM +0200, Daniel Näslund wrote:
> gstein pointed out that I should use SVN_IS_VALID_REVNUM(). Fixed!
> @@ -290,6 +290,16 @@ main(int argc, const char *argv[])
>return EXIT_FAILURE;
> }
>
> + if (SVN_IS_VALID_REVNUM(res->min_rev))
Doesn't this revers
David Darj writes:
> Do I need to do some additional setup for authorization in Apache
> other then configure for mod_dav_svn
> and mod_authz_svn as stated in INSTALL section E.6 ?
That appears to be out-of-date, try
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/trunk/subversion/tests/cmdline/READ
On 2010-04-02 10:16, David Darj wrote:
On 2010-03-31 10:12, Julian Foad wrote:
David Darj wrote:
[...]
But when running against http:// I get
22 tests SKIPPED
25 tests XFAILED
74 tests FAILED (list below)
1 tests XPASSED
Searching for some of them didn't give me any clues.
M
We're running out of patch versions here ...
gstein pointed out that I should use SVN_IS_VALID_REVNUM(). Fixed!
On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 10:59:15AM +0200, Daniel Näslund wrote:
> Mispelled Uncommitted with one 't'. This patch corrects that.
>
> On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 10:36:53AM +0200, Daniel Näs
Mispelled Uncommitted with one 't'. This patch corrects that.
On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 10:36:53AM +0200, Daniel Näslund wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 11:04:13PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 10:14:42PM +0200, Daniel Näslund wrote:
> > > Ping! This patch has not been r
On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 10:22:56AM +0200, Daniel Näslund wrote:
> Hi Julian!
>
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 10:19:10AM +0100, Julian Foad wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-03-30, Daniel Näslund wrote:
> > > Ping! This patch has not been revieved
> >
> > [...]
> > > > [[[
> > > > Follow-up to r922176. Fix that
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 11:04:13PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 10:14:42PM +0200, Daniel Näslund wrote:
> > Ping! This patch has not been reviewed!
> >
> > On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 09:38:15PM +0100, Daniel Näslund wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > The 1.6 svnversion message w
Hi Julian!
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 10:19:10AM +0100, Julian Foad wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-03-30, Daniel Näslund wrote:
> > Ping! This patch has not been revieved
>
> [...]
> > > [[[
> > > Follow-up to r922176. Fix that tree changes were not considered when
> > > determining if the wc has modificatio
On 2010-03-31 10:12, Julian Foad wrote:
David Darj wrote:
[...]
But when running against http:// I get
22 tests SKIPPED
25 tests XFAILED
74 tests FAILED (list below)
1 tests XPASSED
Searching for some of them didn't give me any clues.
My environment:
WindowsXP MCE, fully
21 matches
Mail list logo
