Mispelled Uncommitted with one 't'. This patch corrects that.

On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 10:36:53AM +0200, Daniel Näslund wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 11:04:13PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 10:14:42PM +0200, Daniel Näslund wrote:
> > > Ping! This patch has not been reviewed!
> > > 
> > > On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 09:38:15PM +0100, Daniel Näslund wrote:
> > > > Hi!
> > > > 
> > > > The 1.6 svnversion message was "'path' not versioned, and not exported".
> > > > But on trunk more than one message has been changed. My first thought
> > > > was that we should be backward compat in our output but if changes of
> > > > those messages are ok I'm supplying one.
> > > > 
> > > > In case we will use new messages, the help text must be updated. It
> > > > talks of 'exported' but those are not used in the new messages.
> > > > 
> > > > [[[
> > > > After the changes in r922176, versioned but not yet committed files were
> > > > not properly detected. Fixed now!
> > > > 
> > > > * subversion/svnversion/main.c
> > > >   (main): Check for invalid rev nr for files and dirs.
> > > > 
> > > > * subversion/tests/cmdline/svnversion_tests.py
> > > >   (structural_changes): New.
> > > >   (tests_list): Add new test.
> > > > ]]]
> > > 
> > > > Index: subversion/svnversion/main.c
> > > > ===================================================================
> > > > --- subversion/svnversion/main.c        (revision 922931)
> > > > +++ subversion/svnversion/main.c        (arbetskopia)
> > > > @@ -290,6 +290,17 @@
> > > >        return EXIT_FAILURE;
> > > >      }
> > > >  
> > > > +  if (res->min_rev == -1)
> > 
> > s/-1/SVN_INVALID_REVNUM/
> 
> Fixed!
>  
> > > > +    {
> > > > +      /* Local uncommited modifications, no revision info was found. */
> > > > +      SVN_INT_ERR(svn_cmdline_printf(pool, _("Local uncommitted "
> > > > +                                             "modifications, no 
> > > > revision "
> > > > +                                             "information found%s"),
> > > > +                                     no_newline ? "" : "\n"));
> > 
> > "No revision information found" sounds a bit like something went
> > wrong, as in, Subversion was looking for information that was
> > expected to be present but it didn't find the information.
> > What about "Uncommitted local addition, copy, or move%s" instead?
> 
> I agree with you (user messages is my weak spot). The only cases when we
> can have no revision number but the path is under version control is for
> locally added, copied or moved paths. So we tell the user about it.
> 
> Can I have your +1 for commiting?
Index: subversion/tests/cmdline/svnversion_tests.py
===================================================================
--- subversion/tests/cmdline/svnversion_tests.py        (revision 930183)
+++ subversion/tests/cmdline/svnversion_tests.py        (working copy)
@@ -236,7 +236,36 @@ def svnversion_with_excluded_subtrees(sbox):
   svntest.actions.run_and_verify_svnversion("working copy with excluded file",
                                             D_path, repo_url + '/A/D',
                                             [ "1P\n" ], [])
+def structural_changes(sbox):
+  "test 'svnversion' with structural changes"
+  sbox.build()
+  wc_dir = sbox.wc_dir
+  repo_url = sbox.repo_url
 
+  iota_path = os.path.join(wc_dir, 'iota')
+  iota_copy_path = os.path.join(wc_dir, 'iota_copy')
+
+  svntest.actions.run_and_verify_svn(None, None, [],
+                                     'cp', iota_path, iota_copy_path)
+
+  svntest.actions.run_and_verify_svnversion("Copied file",
+                                            iota_copy_path, repo_url +
+                                            '/iota_copy',
+                                            [ "Local uncommitted "
+                                            "modifications, no revision "
+                                            "information found\n" ], [])
+  C_path = os.path.join(wc_dir, 'A', 'C')
+  C_copy_path = os.path.join(wc_dir, 'C_copy')
+  svntest.actions.run_and_verify_svn(None, None, [],
+                                     'cp', C_path, C_copy_path)
+
+  svntest.actions.run_and_verify_svnversion("Copied dir",
+                                            C_copy_path, repo_url +
+                                            '/C_copy',
+                                            [ "Local uncommitted "
+                                            "modifications, no revision "
+                                            "information found\n" ], [])
+
 ########################################################################
 # Run the tests
 
@@ -246,6 +275,7 @@ test_list = [ None,
               svnversion_test,
               ignore_externals,
               svnversion_with_excluded_subtrees,
+              structural_changes,
              ]
 
 if __name__ == '__main__':
Index: subversion/svnversion/main.c
===================================================================
--- subversion/svnversion/main.c        (revision 930183)
+++ subversion/svnversion/main.c        (working copy)
@@ -290,6 +290,16 @@ main(int argc, const char *argv[])
       return EXIT_FAILURE;
     }
 
+  if (res->min_rev == SVN_INVALID_REVNUM)
+    {
+      /* Local uncommited modifications, no revision info was found. */
+      SVN_INT_ERR(svn_cmdline_printf(pool, _("Uncommitted local addition "
+                                             "copy, or move%s"),
+                                             no_newline ? "" : "\n"));
+      svn_pool_destroy(pool);
+      return EXIT_SUCCESS;
+    }
+
   /* Build compact '123[:456]M?S?' string. */
   SVN_INT_ERR(svn_cmdline_printf(pool, "%ld", res->min_rev));
   if (res->min_rev != res->max_rev)

Reply via email to