Hi all,
Thanks for your review and vote for Apache StormCrawler (Incubating) 3.0
Release Candidate 2
I'm happy to announce the vote has passed:
4 binding votes, 1 non-binding, no +0 or -1 votes.
Thanks for reviewing and voting.
+4 (binding) +1, from:
- PJ Fanning
- Dave Fisher
- Richard Zowall
+1 (Binding)
* Built from source
* Verified checksums
* Verified Signatures
* No diff b/w the git tag & src zip
* Verified all java files have apache header
* Verified incubating in name
* Verified DISCLAIMER file exists
* Verified NOTICE & LICENSE file exits
-Ayush
On Mon, 13 May 2024 at 12:50,
Here is my own +1 (binding)
I did the following:
- Build from source
- Build from tag
- Used artifacts from the staging repository in our SC-based project
- Conducted a crawl (mostly with OpenSearch as a backend) as a local
cluster, a docker compose cluster setup and on a k8s cluster setup.
- Che
+1 to release
Built from source and ran a crawl successfully.
Thanks
Julien
On Tue, 7 May 2024 at 10:13, Richard Zowalla wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I have posted a 2nd release candidate for the Apache StormCrawler
> (Incubating) 3.0 release and it is ready for testing.
>
> The previous VOTE was ca
Great, thanks for your thoughts. I think, we won't re-roll for now (given we
don't know the opinions on general@ and we still can do the LEGAL path in the
near future).
Thx
Richard
Am 10. Mai 2024 16:49:07 MESZ schrieb Dave Fisher :
>
>
>> On May 9, 2024, at 9:50 PM, Richard Zowalla wrote:
>
> On May 9, 2024, at 9:50 PM, Richard Zowalla wrote:
>
> Noted, thx!
>
> I have created some issues to track the feedback received so far:
>
> - (1) https://github.com/apache/incubator-stormcrawler/issues/1214
> - (2) https://github.com/apache/incubator-stormcrawler/issues/1215
> - (3) http
Noted, thx!
I have created some issues to track the feedback received so far:
- (1) https://github.com/apache/incubator-stormcrawler/issues/1214
- (2) https://github.com/apache/incubator-stormcrawler/issues/1215
- (3) https://github.com/apache/incubator-stormcrawler/issues/1216
- (4) https://git
I see it in the pom.xml:
${project.basedir}/rat
**/*.yml
You are correct. When we go to general@incubator swap Source with Maven.
> On May 9, 2024, at 1:45 PM, Richard Zowalla wrote:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/stormcrawler/stormcrawler-3.0/
> is contained in the mail in the "Source" section?
>
> The Rat excludes are define
That’s good to have, but people voting on an RC will most likely run rat on
their own machines.
Sent from my iPhone
> On May 9, 2024, at 3:47 PM, Richard Zowalla wrote:
>
> Site note: "rat" is executed as part of the (CI) build and uses a similar
> config AS some ASF TLP projects (not sayin
The fixes for the website are fine. Thx for the hint.
We can just fix that before going to the general@ list. We might also want to
remove the "there are no ASF releases" thing in this process which isn't
correct for the staging website given we are voting in a first release.
Am 9. Mai 2024 22
Site note: "rat" is executed as part of the (CI) build and uses a similar
config AS some ASF TLP projects (not saying they are always right ;-) )
Am 9. Mai 2024 22:10:35 MESZ schrieb Josh Fischer :
>In my experience I’ve found that Dave is right most of the time.
>
> Based on his comments I’ll
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/stormcrawler/stormcrawler-3.0/
is contained in the mail in the "Source" section?
The Rat excludes are defined in the related plugin config, which can be
updated, if needed.
Am 9. Mai 2024 22:04:40 MESZ schrieb Dave Fisher :
>Once this VOTE pass
In my experience I’ve found that Dave is right most of the time.
Based on his comments I’ll change my vote to +1 (non-binding).
Sent from my iPhone
> On May 9, 2024, at 3:05 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> Once this VOTE passes here you must include the link to
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
Once this VOTE passes here you must include the link to
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/stormcrawler/stormcrawler-3.0/
artifacts in the IPMC VOTE. If you don’t then it will be a quick -1.
The artifacts in
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/stormcrawler/stormcrawle
I'm -1 (non-binding) on this one. I think we have several files that do not
have the Apache header on them. If these files do in fact require a
header, it needs to be added. If they do not, they should be added to a
.ratexcludes file.
See rat output below:
command I ran was:
java -jar ~/apach
+1
shasum checks out for source
Built locally on ubuntu with Java 17
Thank you!
On 2024/05/07 09:12:55 Richard Zowalla wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I have posted a 2nd release candidate for the Apache StormCrawler
> (Incubating) 3.0 release and it is ready for testing.
>
> The previous VOTE was ca
Hi folks,
I have posted a 2nd release candidate for the Apache StormCrawler
(Incubating) 3.0 release and it is ready for testing.
The previous VOTE was cancelled because building from source (without
an initalized git repo) wasn't possible.
This is our first release after joining the ASF incuba
18 matches
Mail list logo
