Site note: "rat" is executed as part of the (CI) build and uses a similar config AS some ASF TLP projects (not saying they are always right ;-) )
Am 9. Mai 2024 22:10:35 MESZ schrieb Josh Fischer <j...@joshfischer.io>: >In my experience I’ve found that Dave is right most of the time. > > Based on his comments I’ll change my vote to +1 (non-binding). > > >Sent from my iPhone > >> On May 9, 2024, at 3:05 PM, Dave Fisher <w...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> Once this VOTE passes here you must include the link to >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/stormcrawler/stormcrawler-3.0/ >> artifacts in the IPMC VOTE. If you don’t then it will be a quick -1. >> >> The artifacts in >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/stormcrawler/stormcrawler-3.0/ >> are what we must check and vote on. We can compare this with GitHub tags to >> verify they have the same content. >> >> On https://stormcrawler.staged.apache.org/download/index.html the sha and >> asc should use downloads.apache.org instead of closer.cgi. The source >> release should use closer.lua instead of closer.cgi. >> >> Ask on #asfinfra slack if you want to confirm the proper use of downloads >> and closer.lua. >> >> It is likely that the IPMC VOTE will discuss some of the yaml, md, sh, and >> txt requiring a License header if the format supports it. I know that json >> and ndjson (jsonl) files don’t support this. Files which do not support a >> License header ought to be listed in a .rat-excludes file. >> >> It is up to you about fixing this now or going ahead with fixing this now. >> >> I’m VOTING +1 (binding) for now. >> >> I checked the signature and checksum and they are good. LICENSE and NOTICE >> are good for a source release. The GitHub tag include the .github directory >> and .asf.yaml while the source release adds DEPENDENCIES >> >> Best, >> Dave >> >>> On May 9, 2024, at 9:45 AM, Tim Allison <talli...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>> +1 >>> >>> shasum checks out for source >>> Built locally on ubuntu with Java 17 >>> >>> Thank you! >>> >>>> On 2024/05/07 09:12:55 Richard Zowalla wrote: >>>> Hi folks, >>>> >>>> I have posted a 2nd release candidate for the Apache StormCrawler >>>> (Incubating) 3.0 release and it is ready for testing. >>>> >>>> The previous VOTE was cancelled because building from source (without >>>> an initalized git repo) wasn't possible. >>>> >>>> This is our first release after joining the ASF incubator as a >>>> poddling. It is a breaking change with renamings in the group ids and >>>> the removal of the elasticsearch module. >>>> >>>> Thank you to everyone who contributed to this release, including all of >>>> our users and the people who submitted bug reports, >>>> contributed code or documentation enhancements. >>>> >>>> The release was made using the Apache StormCrawler (Incubating) release >>>> process, documented here: >>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-stormcrawler/RELEASING.md >>>> >>>> Maven Repo: >>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestormcrawler-1001/ >>>> >>>> <repositories> >>>> <repository> >>>> <id>stormcrawler-3.0-rc1</id> >>>> <name>Testing StormCrawler 3.0 release candidate</name> >>>> <url> >>>> >>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestormcrawler-1001/ >>>> </url> >>>> </repository> >>>> </repositories> >>>> >>>> Source: >>>> >>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/stormcrawler/stormcrawler-3.0/ >>>> >>>> >>>> Tag: >>>> >>>> >>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-stormcrawler/releases/tag/stormcrawler-3.0 >>>> >>>> Preview of website: >>>> >>>> https://stormcrawler.staged.apache.org/download/index.html >>>> >>>> Release notes: >>>> >>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-stormcrawler/releases/tag/stormcrawler-3.0 >>>> >>>> Reminder: The up-2-date KEYS file for signature verification can be >>>> found here: >>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/stormcrawler/KEYS >>>> >>>> Please vote on releasing these packages as Apache StormCrawler >>>> (Incubating) 3.0 >>>> >>>> The vote is open for at least the next 72 hours. >>>> >>>> Only votes from IPMC members are binding, but everyone on the PPMC is >>>> welcome to check the release candidate and vote. >>>> >>>> The vote passes if at least three binding +1 votes are cast. >>>> >>>> Please VOTE >>>> >>>> [+1] go ship it >>>> [+0] meh, don't care >>>> [-1] stop, there is a ${showstopper} >>>> >>>> Please include your checklist in your vote: >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/Incubator+Release+Checklist >>>> >>>> Note: After this VOTE passes on our dev@ list, the VOTE will be brought >>>> to general@ in order to get the necessary IPMC votes. >>>> >>>> Thanks! >>>> Richard >>>> >>>> >>
