You are correct. When we go to general@incubator swap Source with Maven.
> On May 9, 2024, at 1:45 PM, Richard Zowalla <rich...@zowalla.com> wrote:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/stormcrawler/stormcrawler-3.0/
> is contained in the mail in the "Source" section?
>
> The Rat excludes are defined in the related plugin config, which can be
> updated, if needed.
>
>
> Am 9. Mai 2024 22:04:40 MESZ schrieb Dave Fisher <w...@apache.org>:
>> Once this VOTE passes here you must include the link to
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/stormcrawler/stormcrawler-3.0/
>> artifacts in the IPMC VOTE. If you don’t then it will be a quick -1.
>>
>> The artifacts in
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/stormcrawler/stormcrawler-3.0/
>> are what we must check and vote on. We can compare this with GitHub tags to
>> verify they have the same content.
>>
>> On https://stormcrawler.staged.apache.org/download/index.html the sha and
>> asc should use downloads.apache.org instead of closer.cgi. The source
>> release should use closer.lua instead of closer.cgi.
>>
>> Ask on #asfinfra slack if you want to confirm the proper use of downloads
>> and closer.lua.
>>
>> It is likely that the IPMC VOTE will discuss some of the yaml, md, sh, and
>> txt requiring a License header if the format supports it. I know that json
>> and ndjson (jsonl) files don’t support this. Files which do not support a
>> License header ought to be listed in a .rat-excludes file.
>>
>> It is up to you about fixing this now or going ahead with fixing this now.
>>
>> I’m VOTING +1 (binding) for now.
>>
>> I checked the signature and checksum and they are good. LICENSE and NOTICE
>> are good for a source release. The GitHub tag include the .github directory
>> and .asf.yaml while the source release adds DEPENDENCIES
>>
>> Best,
>> Dave
>>
>>> On May 9, 2024, at 9:45 AM, Tim Allison <talli...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> shasum checks out for source
>>> Built locally on ubuntu with Java 17
>>>
>>> Thank you!
>>>
>>> On 2024/05/07 09:12:55 Richard Zowalla wrote:
>>>> Hi folks,
>>>>
>>>> I have posted a 2nd release candidate for the Apache StormCrawler
>>>> (Incubating) 3.0 release and it is ready for testing.
>>>>
>>>> The previous VOTE was cancelled because building from source (without
>>>> an initalized git repo) wasn't possible.
>>>>
>>>> This is our first release after joining the ASF incubator as a
>>>> poddling. It is a breaking change with renamings in the group ids and
>>>> the removal of the elasticsearch module.
>>>>
>>>> Thank you to everyone who contributed to this release, including all of
>>>> our users and the people who submitted bug reports,
>>>> contributed code or documentation enhancements.
>>>>
>>>> The release was made using the Apache StormCrawler (Incubating) release
>>>> process, documented here:
>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-stormcrawler/RELEASING.md
>>>>
>>>> Maven Repo:
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestormcrawler-1001/
>>>>
>>>> <repositories>
>>>> <repository>
>>>> <id>stormcrawler-3.0-rc1</id>
>>>> <name>Testing StormCrawler 3.0 release candidate</name>
>>>> <url>
>>>>
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestormcrawler-1001/
>>>> </url>
>>>> </repository>
>>>> </repositories>
>>>>
>>>> Source:
>>>>
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/stormcrawler/stormcrawler-3.0/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Tag:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-stormcrawler/releases/tag/stormcrawler-3.0
>>>>
>>>> Preview of website:
>>>>
>>>> https://stormcrawler.staged.apache.org/download/index.html
>>>>
>>>> Release notes:
>>>>
>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-stormcrawler/releases/tag/stormcrawler-3.0
>>>>
>>>> Reminder: The up-2-date KEYS file for signature verification can be
>>>> found here:
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/stormcrawler/KEYS
>>>>
>>>> Please vote on releasing these packages as Apache StormCrawler
>>>> (Incubating) 3.0
>>>>
>>>> The vote is open for at least the next 72 hours.
>>>>
>>>> Only votes from IPMC members are binding, but everyone on the PPMC is
>>>> welcome to check the release candidate and vote.
>>>>
>>>> The vote passes if at least three binding +1 votes are cast.
>>>>
>>>> Please VOTE
>>>>
>>>> [+1] go ship it
>>>> [+0] meh, don't care
>>>> [-1] stop, there is a ${showstopper}
>>>>
>>>> Please include your checklist in your vote:
>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/Incubator+Release+Checklist
>>>>
>>>> Note: After this VOTE passes on our dev@ list, the VOTE will be brought
>>>> to general@ in order to get the necessary IPMC votes.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>> Richard
>>>>
>>>>
>>