Thanks for the details and clarification.
Great to see both communities working together to help our users !
+1 on the proposal.
Regards,
Mridul
On Tue, May 6, 2025 at 5:12 PM Jia Yu wrote:
> Hi Mridul,
>
> Thanks for bringing this up. This is Jia Yu from Apache Sedona. I casted
> my vote as
Hi Mridul,
Thanks for bringing this up. This is Jia Yu from Apache Sedona. I casted my
vote as +0 (non-binding). This means "I don't feel strongly about it, but
I'm okay with this." according to the ASF definition:
https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
In my opinion, Spark could just dele
Hi Mridul,
Just wanted to add that we intent to work with the Apache Sedona community
anyways going forward.
- Menelaos
> On May 6, 2025, at 6:45 AM, Wenchen Fan wrote:
>
> Hi Mridul,
>
> The conclusion is that we will standardize the basic geo data types in Spark,
> which allows third-par
+1
Dongjoon
On 2025/05/06 14:05:13 "Rozov, Vlad" wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
>
> On May 6, 2025, at 6:34 AM, Sakthi wrote:
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Tue, May 6, 2025 at 1:30 AM Max Gekk
> mailto:max.g...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tue, May 6, 2025 at 9:59 AM Yang Jie
> mailto:yangji
+1 (non-binding)
On May 6, 2025, at 6:34 AM, Sakthi wrote:
+1 (non-binding)
On Tue, May 6, 2025 at 1:30 AM Max Gekk
mailto:max.g...@gmail.com>> wrote:
+1
On Tue, May 6, 2025 at 9:59 AM Yang Jie
mailto:yangji...@apache.org>> wrote:
+1
On 2025/05/06 03:25:21 "L. C. Hsieh" wrote:
> +1
>
> On
Hi Mridul,
The conclusion is that we will standardize the basic geo data types in
Spark, which allows third-party data sources and user-defined functions to
support geo data types natively when integrating with Spark. The majority
of geo processing functions will still be in Apache Sedona (or othe
+1 (non-binding)
On Tue, May 6, 2025 at 1:30 AM Max Gekk wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tue, May 6, 2025 at 9:59 AM Yang Jie wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On 2025/05/06 03:25:21 "L. C. Hsieh" wrote:
>> > +1
>> >
>> > On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 8:22 PM Gengliang Wang wrote:
>> > >
>> > > +1
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, May 5,
+1
On Tue, May 6, 2025 at 9:59 AM Yang Jie wrote:
> +1
>
> On 2025/05/06 03:25:21 "L. C. Hsieh" wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 8:22 PM Gengliang Wang wrote:
> > >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 6:54 PM Ruifeng Zheng
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> +1
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, May
Hi,
What was the conclusion of the discussion with Apache Sedona project ?
Are they aligned with leveraging the support being built here ?
Regards,
Mridul
On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 10:22 PM Gengliang Wang wrote:
> +1
>
> On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 6:54 PM Ruifeng Zheng wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Tue,
+1
On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 8:22 PM Gengliang Wang wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 6:54 PM Ruifeng Zheng wrote:
>>
>> +1
>>
>> On Tue, May 6, 2025 at 9:51 AM Xiao Li wrote:
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 18:35 Yuming Wang wrote:
+1
On Tue, May 6, 2025 at 9
+1
On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 6:54 PM Ruifeng Zheng wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tue, May 6, 2025 at 9:51 AM Xiao Li wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 18:35 Yuming Wang wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 6, 2025 at 9:12 AM Denny Lee wrote:
>>>
+1 (non-binding)
On Mon, May 5, 2025
+1
On Tue, May 6, 2025 at 9:51 AM Xiao Li wrote:
> +1
>
> On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 18:35 Yuming Wang wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Tue, May 6, 2025 at 9:12 AM Denny Lee wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>
>>> On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 18:03 Wenchen Fan wrote:
>>>
+1
On Tue, May 6, 2025 at
+1 (Non-biding?
Excuse the thumb typos
On Mon, 05 May 2025 at 6:50 PM, Xiao Li wrote:
> +1
>
> On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 18:35 Yuming Wang wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Tue, May 6, 2025 at 9:12 AM Denny Lee wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>
>>> On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 18:03 Wenchen Fan wrote:
>>>
>>
+1
On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 18:35 Yuming Wang wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tue, May 6, 2025 at 9:12 AM Denny Lee wrote:
>
>> +1 (non-binding)
>>
>> On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 18:03 Wenchen Fan wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 6, 2025 at 3:40 AM Reynold Xin
>>> wrote:
>>>
+1
On Mon, Ma
+1
On Tue, May 6, 2025 at 9:12 AM Denny Lee wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 18:03 Wenchen Fan wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Tue, May 6, 2025 at 3:40 AM Reynold Xin
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 12:37 PM Bjørn Jørgensen <
>>> bjornjorgen...@gmail.com> wro
+1 (non-binding)
On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 18:03 Wenchen Fan wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tue, May 6, 2025 at 3:40 AM Reynold Xin
> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>>
>> On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 12:37 PM Bjørn Jørgensen
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> man. 5. mai 2025 kl. 21:28 skrev Milan Stefanovic <
>>> stefanovic.mila...@
+1
On Tue, May 6, 2025 at 3:40 AM Reynold Xin
wrote:
> +1
>
>
> On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 12:37 PM Bjørn Jørgensen
> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> man. 5. mai 2025 kl. 21:28 skrev Milan Stefanovic <
>> stefanovic.mila...@gmail.com>:
>>
>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Milan
>>>
>>> On Mon, 5 May 20
+1
On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 12:37 PM Bjørn Jørgensen
wrote:
> +1
>
> man. 5. mai 2025 kl. 21:28 skrev Milan Stefanovic <
> stefanovic.mila...@gmail.com>:
>
>> +1 (non-binding)
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Milan
>>
>> On Mon, 5 May 2025 at 21:25, Jia Yu wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks for putting this together.
>>>
>>>
+1
man. 5. mai 2025 kl. 21:28 skrev Milan Stefanovic <
stefanovic.mila...@gmail.com>:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Thanks,
> Milan
>
> On Mon, 5 May 2025 at 21:25, Jia Yu wrote:
>
>> Thanks for putting this together.
>>
>> +0 (non-binding) from my side. Happy to see geospatial data is getting
>> atten
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks,
Milan
On Mon, 5 May 2025 at 21:25, Jia Yu wrote:
> Thanks for putting this together.
>
> +0 (non-binding) from my side. Happy to see geospatial data is getting
> attention but we need to make it right.
>
>
> Jia Yu
>
>
>
> On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 12:15 PM Szehon Ho wrot
Thanks for putting this together.
+0 (non-binding) from my side. Happy to see geospatial data is getting
attention but we need to make it right.
Jia Yu
On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 12:15 PM Szehon Ho wrote:
> +1 (non binding)
>
> Thanks
> Szehon
>
> On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 11:17 AM DB Tsai wrote:
+1 (non binding)
Thanks
Szehon
On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 11:17 AM DB Tsai wrote:
> +1, geospatial types will be a great feature for Spark. Thanks for working
> on it.
>
> On May 5, 2025, at 11:04 AM, Menelaos Karavelas <
> menelaos.karave...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I started the discussion on addin
+1, geospatial types will be a great feature for Spark. Thanks for working on
it.
> On May 5, 2025, at 11:04 AM, Menelaos Karavelas
> wrote:
>
> I started the discussion on adding geospatial types to Spark on March 28th.
> Since then there has been some discussion in the dev mailing list, as
I started the discussion on adding geospatial types to Spark on March 28th.
Since then there has been some discussion in the dev mailing list, as well as
in the SPIP doc.
At this point I would like to move to a formal vote on adding support for
geospatial types to Spark.
*Discussion thread:*
ht
24 matches
Mail list logo
