Thanks for putting this together. +0 (non-binding) from my side. Happy to see geospatial data is getting attention but we need to make it right.
Jia Yu On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 12:15 PM Szehon Ho <szehon.apa...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 (non binding) > > Thanks > Szehon > > On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 11:17 AM DB Tsai <dbt...@dbtsai.com> wrote: > >> +1, geospatial types will be a great feature for Spark. Thanks for >> working on it. >> >> On May 5, 2025, at 11:04 AM, Menelaos Karavelas < >> menelaos.karave...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I started the discussion on adding geospatial types to Spark on March >> 28th. >> Since then there has been some discussion in the dev mailing list, as >> well as in the SPIP doc. >> >> At this point I would like to move to a formal vote on adding support for >> geospatial types to Spark. >> >> *Discussion thread:* >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/07ozv8ccfddd5tnfl8t74dr4tvnjdkpg >> >> *SPIP:* >> >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1cYSNPGh95OjnpS0k_KDHGM9Ae3j-_0Wnc_eGBZL4D3w/edit?tab=t.0 >> >> *JIRA:* >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-51658 >> >> >> Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours: >> >> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP >> [ ] +0 >> [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because >> >> Menelaos Karavelas >> >>
