+1 On Tue, May 6, 2025 at 3:40 AM Reynold Xin <r...@databricks.com.invalid> wrote:
> +1 > > > On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 12:37 PM Bjørn Jørgensen <bjornjorgen...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> +1 >> >> man. 5. mai 2025 kl. 21:28 skrev Milan Stefanovic < >> stefanovic.mila...@gmail.com>: >> >>> +1 (non-binding) >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Milan >>> >>> On Mon, 5 May 2025 at 21:25, Jia Yu <ji...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>>> Thanks for putting this together. >>>> >>>> +0 (non-binding) from my side. Happy to see geospatial data is getting >>>> attention but we need to make it right. >>>> >>>> >>>> Jia Yu >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 12:15 PM Szehon Ho <szehon.apa...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 (non binding) >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> Szehon >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 11:17 AM DB Tsai <dbt...@dbtsai.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> +1, geospatial types will be a great feature for Spark. Thanks for >>>>>> working on it. >>>>>> >>>>>> On May 5, 2025, at 11:04 AM, Menelaos Karavelas < >>>>>> menelaos.karave...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I started the discussion on adding geospatial types to Spark on >>>>>> March 28th. >>>>>> Since then there has been some discussion in the dev mailing list, as >>>>>> well as in the SPIP doc. >>>>>> >>>>>> At this point I would like to move to a formal vote on adding support >>>>>> for geospatial types to Spark. >>>>>> >>>>>> *Discussion thread:* >>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/07ozv8ccfddd5tnfl8t74dr4tvnjdkpg >>>>>> >>>>>> *SPIP:* >>>>>> >>>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1cYSNPGh95OjnpS0k_KDHGM9Ae3j-_0Wnc_eGBZL4D3w/edit?tab=t.0 >>>>>> >>>>>> *JIRA:* >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-51658 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours: >>>>>> >>>>>> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP >>>>>> [ ] +0 >>>>>> [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because >>>>>> >>>>>> Menelaos Karavelas >>>>>> >>>>>> >> >> -- >> Bjørn Jørgensen >> Vestre Aspehaug 4, 6010 Ålesund >> Norge >> >> +47 480 94 297 >> >
