Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark Connect Swift Client 0.1.0 (RC1)

Not sure this counts as -1, but by cursory checking the code, I found that the way the TLS connection is set up is not always working: https://github.com/apache/spark-connect-swift/blob/v0.1.0-rc1/Sources/SparkConnect/DataFrame.swift#L276-L288 Shows that DataFrame operations explicitly set plaint

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark Connect Swift Client 0.1.0 (RC1)

+1 (non-binding) G On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 8:35 AM huaxin gao wrote: > +1 Thanks Dongjoon. > > On Sun, May 4, 2025 at 5:21 PM Dongjoon Hyun wrote: > >> +1 >> >> I checked the checksum and signatures, and tested with Apache Spark 4.0.0 >> RC4 on Swift 6.1. >> >> This is the initial release (v0.1

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark K8s Operator 0.1.0 (RC1)

+1 (non-binding) G On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 8:59 AM huaxin gao wrote: > +1 Thanks Dongjoon. > > On Sun, May 4, 2025 at 7:36 PM Rozov, Vlad > wrote: > >> +1 (not binding) >> >> Checked checksum and signatures, build, and confirmed that binary files >> are not included into the release. >> >> Is

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark K8s Operator 0.1.0 (RC1)

+1 (non-binding) Kazu > On May 4, 2025, at 11:57 PM, huaxin gao wrote: > > +1 Thanks Dongjoon. > > On Sun, May 4, 2025 at 7:36 PM Rozov, Vlad wrote: >> +1 (not binding) >> >> Checked checksum and signatures, build, and confirmed that binary files are >> not included into the release. >> >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark Connect Swift Client 0.1.0 (RC1)

+1 (non-binding) Kazu > On May 4, 2025, at 11:31 PM, huaxin gao wrote: > > +1 Thanks Dongjoon. > > On Sun, May 4, 2025 at 5:21 PM Dongjoon Hyun > wrote: >> +1 >> >> I checked the checksum and signatures, and tested with Apache Spark 4.0.0 >> RC4 on Swift 6.1. >>