Hi, all
This PR contributed to pip 298: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21114
This pip is to implement Read Committed and Read Uncommitted isolation levels
for Pulsar transactions, allow consumers to configure isolation levels during
the building process.
For more details, please refe
Thanks for Dave and xiangying.
Does anyone have any other questions or concerns?
Replied Message
| From | Xiangying Meng |
| Date | 09/20/2023 15:50 |
| To | dev@pulsar.apache.org |
| Cc | |
| Subject | Re: [DISSCUSS] PIP-298: Consumer supports specifying consumption
isolation level |
Hi dev,
This thread is to start a vote for PIP-298 Consumer supports specifying
consumption isolation level
Discuss thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/8ny0qtp7m9qcdbvnfjdvpnkc4c5ssyld
https://lists.apache.org/thread/2opqjof83425vry6gzszd5glqgryrv11
PIP: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull
Hi Dave,
Thanks for your support.
We have completed the relevant documents:
https://github.com/apache/pulsar-site/pull/712
Pip: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21114
Please help me take a look when you have time.
Thanks,
zhangheng
Replied Message
| From | Xiangying Meng |
| Da
Hi dev,
This thread is to start a vote for PIP-298 Consumer supports specifying
consumption isolation level.
Discuss thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/8ny0qtp7m9qcdbvnfjdvpnkc4c5ssyld
PIP: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21114
Doc: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-site/pull/712
BR,
Hi dev,
This thread is to start a vote for PIP-298 Consumer supports specifying
consumption isolation level.
Discuss thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/8ny0qtp7m9qcdbvnfjdvpnkc4c5ssyld
PIP: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21114
Doc: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-site/pull/712
BR,
| dev@pulsar.apache.org |
| Cc | |
| Subject | Re: [VOTE] PIP-298 Consumer supports specifying consumption
isolation level |
-1 (binding) I’m not convinced that breaking transaction isolation is the
proper course of action.
Regards,
Dave
> On Sep 25, 2023, at 6:46 AM, hzh0425 wrote:
>
&g
)
On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 1:40 PM Yunze Xu wrote:
+1 (binding)
Thanks,
Yunze
On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 1:08 PM PengHui Li wrote:
+1 (binding)
Regards,
Penghui
On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 10:37 AM hzh0425 wrote:
Dave previously mentioned in the discussion thread that he will
continue
to support
