+1
Penghui
On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 1:47 PM Michael Marshall
wrote:
> +1 I support removing the retries for the many reasons already mentioned.
>
> - Michael
>
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 12:35 AM Matteo Merli wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> > The retry that repeats the whole maven job is often hiding th
+1
Enrico
Il giorno mar 12 lug 2022 alle ore 09:24 PengHui Li
ha scritto:
>
> +1
>
> Penghui
>
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 1:47 PM Michael Marshall
> wrote:
>
> > +1 I support removing the retries for the many reasons already mentioned.
> >
> > - Michael
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 12:35 AM M
Hello,
I think that we could implement a small but effective enhancement to batching.
It may happen that even if you enable batching you come to create
entries with 1 only message.
Processing batch messages requires a good amount of resources, both on
the broker and on the client side.
Especiall
+1
Good idea.
Thanks
Yubiao Feng
On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 3:54 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote:
> Hello,
> I think that we could implement a small but effective enhancement to
> batching.
>
> It may happen that even if you enable batching you come to create
> entries with 1 only message.
>
> Processing
+1
On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 3:36 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Enrico
>
> Il giorno mar 12 lug 2022 alle ore 09:24 PengHui Li
> ha scritto:
> >
> > +1
> >
> > Penghui
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 1:47 PM Michael Marshall
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 I support removing the retries for the ma
+1
Thanks,
Kai
Hi Zike,
> What about using the Pattern type to store the compiled Pattern in the
TopicConsumerConfigurationData?
Thanks for the suggestion - yes that's a good idea. I'll update the doc.
- Dave
On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 12:04 PM Zike Yang wrote:
> Hi, Dave
>
> Thanks for your proposals. Overal
+1
Good idea! It will greatly reduce the resource consumption of small batches.
Yubiao Feng 于2022年7月12日周二 16:00写道：
> +1
> Good idea.
>
> Thanks
> Yubiao Feng
>
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 3:54 PM Enrico Olivelli
> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> > I think that we could implement a small but effective enhan
+1
Thanks
ZhangJian He
Qiang Huang 于2022年7月12日周二 17:34写道：
> +1
> Good idea! It will greatly reduce the resource consumption of small
> batches.
>
> Yubiao Feng 于2022年7月12日周二 16:00写道：
>
> > +1
> > Good idea.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Yubiao Feng
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 3:54 PM Enrico Olivelli
Hi,
In the previous email[1] I started a discussion about enabling GitHub
Discussions in apache/pulsar repository and we meet a consensus to avoid
making development discussions truth happen on the sources. It's also a
requirement of INFRA team[2]
Apart of it, for user-facing discussions it's con
+1
Good idea
Thanks,
Xiaoyu Hou
Enrico Olivelli 于2022年7月12日周二 15:54写道：
> Hello,
> I think that we could implement a small but effective enhancement to
> batching.
>
> It may happen that even if you enable batching you come to create
> entries with 1 only message.
>
> Processing batch messages r
Hi tison, thanks for creating this vote!
I thought we reached a lay consensus since there was no objection since the
last discussion [1]
+1 for this proposal.
I've explained the reasons and showed the benefits previously [2]
[1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/1y7zbchlbokwnpd0jv2tt5jtzg6px6yn
[2]
urfreespace merged PR #145:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-site/pull/145
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pulsar.a
Hello folks,
there is a long standing issue about calculating an accurate backlog
in presence of batch messages [1].
Now that we have PIP-105, broker side filters, the problem becomes bigger.
I have sent a patch [2] to provide a feature to "analise" a
Subscription and scan the non dispatched messa
Jiuming has pushed a fix before https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/14958
which uses the message index to calculate the precise backlog without going
through
all the messages.
Penghui
On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 8:58 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote:
> Hello folks,
> there is a long standing issue about
+1
We should start with a proposal, so that we can clear on the
On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 5:50 PM ZhangJian He wrote:
> +1
>
> Thanks
> ZhangJian He
>
> Qiang Huang 于2022年7月12日周二 17:34写道：
>
> > +1
> > Good idea! It will greatly reduce the resource consumption of small
> > batches.
> >
> > Yubiao
+1
Enrico
Il giorno mar 12 lug 2022 alle ore 13:05 Yu ha scritto:
>
> Hi tison, thanks for creating this vote!
> I thought we reached a lay consensus since there was no objection since the
> last discussion [1]
>
> +1 for this proposal.
> I've explained the reasons and showed the benefits previ
+1
Good idea
Regards
Jiwei Guo (Tboy)
On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 9:07 PM PengHui Li wrote:
> +1
>
> We should start with a proposal, so that we can clear on the
>
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 5:50 PM ZhangJian He wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Thanks
> > ZhangJian He
> >
> > Qiang Huang 于2022年7月12日周二 17:
Thank you all !
I am going to create a issue/feature request
Is there anyone interested in working on that ?
We need a PIP.
The implementation probably won't be hard, but it may impact a few
test cases in the repo, because sometimes we turn on batching to
generate messages
and now if you don't w
Hi Asaf,
On 2022/07/11 13:08:52 Asaf Mesika wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 6:26 AM Haiting Jiang
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Asaf,
> >
> > > I did a quick reading and I couldn't understand the gist of this
change:
> > > The shadow topic doesn't really have it's own messages, or it's own
> > ledgers
> > >
Hi Enrico
I am interesting in working on this task. Could you please assign the work
to me? @AnonHxy
Thanks,
Xiaoyu Hou
Enrico Olivelli 于2022年7月12日周二 22:28写道：
> Thank you all !
>
> I am going to create a issue/feature request
>
> Is there anyone interested in working on that ?
>
> We need a P
Xiaoyu
Il giorno mar 12 lug 2022 alle ore 16:36 Anon Hxy
ha scritto:
>
> Hi Enrico
>
> I am interesting in working on this task. Could you please assign the work
> to me? @AnonHxy
This is the issue
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/16547
I am not sure I can "assign" the issue to you, bu
Il giorno mar 12 lug 2022 alle ore 15:04 PengHui Li
ha scritto:
>
> Jiuming has pushed a fix before https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/14958
> which uses the message index to calculate the precise backlog without going
> through
> all the messages.
I am sorry but it does not cover my needs.
Ac
Go it, thanks Enrico
Best,
Xiaoyu Hou
Enrico Olivelli 于2022年7月12日周二 22:40写道：
> Xiaoyu
>
> Il giorno mar 12 lug 2022 alle ore 16:36 Anon Hxy
> ha scritto:
> >
> > Hi Enrico
> >
> > I am interesting in working on this task. Could you please assign the
> work
> > to me? @AnonHxy
>
>
> This is th
Hi all,
I'd like to propose to enable the Github button "update branch" in the pull
requests.
The main reason is that it helps when you want to rebase your pull to the
current master.
For instance today a fix for a failing job in the CI has been committed and
you were forced to close/reopen the p
Hi,
After multiple discussions during Community meetings: I have updated PIP
with the changes and approach we agreed on. This PIP allows any
metadata-store to generate change-events using plugable
MetadataSynchronizer to publish and handle change events. PIP also uses
change-event topic as a WAL t
Hi,
We have created PIP-184 which helps users to perform cluster migration with
Apache Pulsar. Cluster migration or Blue-Green cluster deployment is one of
the proven solutions to migrate live traffic from one cluster to another.
One of the examples is applications running on Kubernetes sometimes
--
Matteo Merli
On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 12:54 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I think that we could implement a small but effective enhancement to batching.
>
> It may happen that even if you enable batching you come to create
> entries with 1 only message.
>
> Processing batch messages r
Oh, I see.
I think we can start with a proposal? I saw the new REST API introduced in
the PR.
It's better to follow the proposal process to get explicit approvals.
Thanks,
Penghui
On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 10:42 PM Enrico Olivelli
wrote:
> Il giorno mar 12 lug 2022 alle ore 15:04 PengHui Li
> h
+1
Regards
Jiwei Guo (Tboy)
On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 9:53 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote:
> +1
>
>
> Enrico
>
> Il giorno mar 12 lug 2022 alle ore 13:05 Yu ha scritto:
> >
> > Hi tison, thanks for creating this vote!
> > I thought we reached a lay consensus since there was no objection since
> the
momo-jun commented on PR #133:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-site/pull/133#issuecomment-1182700149
Hi @michaeljmarshall did your PR fix the reported three issues mentioned
above? They are still in an open state. Not sure whether you will have
follow-up fixes or not.
--
This is an
michaeljmarshall commented on PR #133:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-site/pull/133#issuecomment-1182732631
@momo-jun - this PR only fixed the `-SNAPSHOT` issue for Javadocs. The
`tools` and the `cpp` client still have `-SNAPSHOT` docs.
--
This is an automated message from the Apac
+1
guo jiwei 于2022年7月13日周三 10:11写道：
> +1
>
>
> Regards
> Jiwei Guo (Tboy)
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 9:53 PM Enrico Olivelli
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> >
> > Enrico
> >
> > Il giorno mar 12 lug 2022 alle ore 13:05 Yu ha
> scritto:
> > >
> > > Hi tison, thanks for creating this vote!
> > > I th
33 matches
Mail list logo
