+1
Regards Jiwei Guo (Tboy) On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 9:53 PM Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > > Enrico > > Il giorno mar 12 lug 2022 alle ore 13:05 Yu <li...@apache.org> ha scritto: > > > > Hi tison, thanks for creating this vote! > > I thought we reached a lay consensus since there was no objection since > the > > last discussion [1] > > > > +1 for this proposal. > > I've explained the reasons and showed the benefits previously [2] > > > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/1y7zbchlbokwnpd0jv2tt5jtzg6px6yn > > [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/83pst643h9cqcryo3zsjd240jmqzvn73 > > > > On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 6:01 PM tison <wander4...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > In the previous email[1] I started a discussion about enabling GitHub > > > Discussions in apache/pulsar repository and we meet a consensus to > avoid > > > making development discussions truth happen on the sources. It's also a > > > requirement of INFRA team[2] > > > > > > Apart of it, for user-facing discussions it's conventions for Pulsar > users > > > who have a GitHub account but are unfamiliar with mailing list to throw > > > their use case and questions on GitHub discussion. > > > > > > Dave has opened and issue[2][3] and prepare the patch[4] for turning > on the > > > discussion option but obviously we still need an explicit consensus > among > > > the community and it's also required before INFRA team takes action. > > > > > > I'd like to start this voting thread for "Enable GitHub Discussion for > > > user-facing discussion", please reply with your opinion: > > > > > > [ ] +1 approve > > > [ ] +0 no opinion > > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > > > > > Best, > > > tison. > > > > > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/1y7zbchlbokwnpd0jv2tt5jtzg6px6yn > > > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-23477 > > > [3] https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/16275 > > > [4] https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/16528 > > > >
