+1

guo jiwei <techno...@apache.org> 于2022年7月13日周三 10:11写道:

> +1
>
>
> Regards
> Jiwei Guo (Tboy)
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 9:53 PM Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> >
> > Enrico
> >
> > Il giorno mar 12 lug 2022 alle ore 13:05 Yu <li...@apache.org> ha
> scritto:
> > >
> > > Hi tison, thanks for creating this vote!
> > > I thought we reached a lay consensus since there was no objection since
> > the
> > > last discussion [1]
> > >
> > > +1 for this proposal.
> > > I've explained the reasons and showed the benefits previously [2]
> > >
> > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/1y7zbchlbokwnpd0jv2tt5jtzg6px6yn
> > > [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/83pst643h9cqcryo3zsjd240jmqzvn73
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 6:01 PM tison <wander4...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > In the previous email[1] I started a discussion about enabling GitHub
> > > > Discussions in apache/pulsar repository and we meet a consensus to
> > avoid
> > > > making development discussions truth happen on the sources. It's
> also a
> > > > requirement of INFRA team[2]
> > > >
> > > > Apart of it, for user-facing discussions it's conventions for Pulsar
> > users
> > > > who have a GitHub account but are unfamiliar with mailing list to
> throw
> > > > their use case and questions on GitHub discussion.
> > > >
> > > > Dave has opened and issue[2][3] and prepare the patch[4] for turning
> > on the
> > > > discussion option but obviously we still need an explicit consensus
> > among
> > > > the community and it's also required before INFRA team takes action.
> > > >
> > > > I'd like to start this voting thread for "Enable GitHub Discussion
> for
> > > > user-facing discussion", please reply with your opinion:
> > > >
> > > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> > > >
> > > > Best,
> > > > tison.
> > > >
> > > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/1y7zbchlbokwnpd0jv2tt5jtzg6px6yn
> > > > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-23477
> > > > [3] https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/16275
> > > > [4] https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/16528
> > > >
> >
>


-- 
BR,
Qiang Huang

Reply via email to